Mark Steel: Do the elderly need a £14m bonus as well as pudding?

 

Mark Steel
Tuesday 03 January 2012 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Almost everyone connected to the elderly or care homes has insisted the Government addresses the issue of the lack of care homes. So the Government has agreed to look into it. One possible cause they might find, if they investigate thoroughly and consult enough people, analysing everything with great care, is that they've cut the number of care homes.

Obviously the Government couldn't know in advance that reducing the number of something might result in there being less of them. But as they're now setting up a group to look into this matter, I suggest the person put in charge is Tina Taylor from Bolton.

Because in Bolton the council cut its budget for services by £40m, and decided its last two care homes should be closed. This was part of the cuts that apparently have to take place, so it's only fair the people who should make the biggest sacrifices are 85-year-olds in care homes. Because we all know it was them who caused this mess. For years, when the staff asked them, "What would you like for dinner, dear?", they'd say, "shepherd's pie, banana and custard, and a £14m bonus please love", with not a thought for how this might bankrupt the eurozone.

Bolton Council said they were looking at whether private homes were more "efficient". Maybe by "efficient" they mean every day, on the button, the residents are left face down in a bowl of soup for nine hours, not like some of these inefficient places where some days it happens and other days it doesn't and they're left all confused.

The problem for Bolton Council was that Tina Taylor's husband, Ken, was in one of the threatened homes, suffering from Alzheimer's, and she was determined he wouldn't have to go through the distress of being moved. So she collected thousands of signatures on a petition, organised public meetings and demonstrations, won the backing of the unions, put her case in the press so eloquently and frequently that she became a local celebrity and made such a magnificent fuss that the council backed down and announced it would keep at least one home open.

Tina Taylor seemed to prove that the way to preserve services is for so many people to oppose them being cut that the council decides it's less hassle to keep them open.

And if we don't resist cuts to care for Alzheimer's patients, it won't be long before the Government announces that not only should they have to pay for their treatment, but they should pay twice, as they'll have forgotten they paid the first time, and such measures are essential given the scale of the deficit.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in