House of Representatives passes same-sex marriage bill, sending it to Joe Biden’s desk
Eight fewer Republicans vote for the bill than did so in July
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The House of Representatives passed legislation to codify protections for same-sex and interracial marriage on Thursday, sending the bill to President Joe Biden’s desk.
The House passed the bill 258-169, with 39 Republicans voting with 219 Democrats.
The Respect for Marriage Act came after the House voted to pass legislation to protect same-sex marriage and interracial marriage earlier this summer after the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v Jackson decision.
“Not only are we on the right side of history, we’re on the right side of the future, expanding freedom in America” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in the bill’s enrollment ceremony.
“For the first time in a decade, we are sending a major LGBTQ+ civil rights bill to the president’s desk,” Representative David Cicilline of Rhode Island, chairman of the Equality Caucus, said. “The vast majority of Americans agree that marriage equality in settled law in this country. And with today’s vote, Congress has provided much-needed security to same-sex and interracial couples who have built their families and lives around marriage equality.”
At that time, Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a concurring opinion saying that the court should also re-examine Griswold v Connecticut, which prohibits states from preventing married couples from obtaining birth control; Lawrence v Texas, which nullified anti-sodomy laws; and Obergefell v Hodges, which legalised same-sex marriage nationwide.
In July, the Respect for Marriage Act passed with 47 Republican votes, eight more votes than when it passed on Thursday.
That sent the legislation to the Senate, where a bipartisan group of senators negotiated the parameters of the bill and passed it last week 61 to 36.
Some Republicans objected to the lack of religious liberty protections.
“I hope and pray that my colleagues will find the courage to join me in opposing this misguided and this dangerous bill,” Representative Vicky Hartzler of Missouri said in a floor speech.
Republican Representative Tim Walberg of Michigan expressed his dismay as well, saying the bill goes beyond what supporters would say it does. He added he opposed it because of a “deep appreciation for science, also, in the positive endeavor of continuing the human race is important.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments