George Floyd anniversary: Joe Biden meets family as US embassies fly Black Lives Matter flag

While attorneys for Derek Chauvin will have to notify the trial court within 60 days if they plan to appeal, the court has already scheduled sentencing for the three charges he was found guilty on 16 June at 1.30pm local time.

In Minnesota, the state wherein Floyd died and Chauvin has been on trial for his death,  second-degree murder carries a maximum sentence of 40 years in prison. Third-degree can see someone have 25 years in prison, and Second-degree manslaughter is punishable by up to 10 years in prison.

Theoretically, these charges could see Chauvin get 75 years in prison. However, state law dictates that the convicted is sentenced only to the most severe count against them - in this case, that would be a maximum of 40-years for second-degree murder. . In this instance, Judge Cahill could opt to ignore state law, but this would be unusual.

Bethany Dawson reports.

After just one day of deliberation on the verdict, the 12-member jury in Minnesota found Chauvin guilty of second-degree murder, third-degree murder, and second-degree manslaughter. All those three different charges have slightly different meanings, writes Bethany Dawson.

In Minnesota, second-degree murder is defined as a killing that was not premeditated, or is caused by reckless conduct without obvious concern for human life.

Third-degree murder is known as a “depraved-heart murder”, that is caused without intent to kill but is inherently dangerous and thus conducted without consideration for human life.

The final charge that Chauvin has been found guilty of is second-degree manslaughter, which occurs when a person continues an act that they know is reckless, despite potentially fatal risks. A manslaughter charge, however, comes when there is no intention to take a life.

In a wide-ranging interview with Associated Press this week, mayor Jacob Frey touched on what was next for the block where George Floyd was killed that has since been dubbed “George Floyd Square”.

Local activists acting as unofficial custodians of the square have a “list of demands” before allowing the city to reopen the intersection, according to AP.

Frey said told the outlet the square would remain focused on racial justice and healing with long-term plans to memorialize Floyd at the site. He said the city would invest in black-owned businesses while also providing services to an area harmed by gun violence.

“This is a beautifully diverse community. ... It’s a community that deserves to feel safe,” he said, adding that there would be a phased reopening that would be a “safe and peaceful reconnection”.

George Floyd’s murder at the hands of a police officer in Minneapolis sparked a movement not just in the US but around the world, bringing forth a global reckoning around race.

In Britain, demonstrators mobilised and took to the streets not just in solidarity but in protest at frustration with racism and policing in the UK. They carried placards with messages such as “The UK is not innocent”, taking aim at slaver statues and colonial relics. Hundreds of petitions urged institutions to tackle systemic inequalities, from the national curriculum to the black maternal mortality rate.

Now, one year on, how much progress has been made?

Nadine White reports:

It was when people said this needs to stop. It was when millions of Americans marched to say no more.

It was a defiant insistence that what had become business as usual – the routine killing by police of unarmed people of colour in what should be everyday interactions – was no longer acceptable.

And yet a year after the murder of 46-year-old George Floyd, the life literally squeezed out of him at a Minneapolis intersection by Derek Chauvin, as worried witnesses urged the officer to stop – and later millions watched around the world – the killings have not stopped.

Andrew Buncombe and Josh Marcus have more:

The Independent’s Josh Marcus, who covered the Chauvin trial will be avaliable to answer your questions about George Floyd, the legal case against his killer, and what comes next, from 6pm BST on Tuesday.

For more information see:

The leader of the Labour party, Keir Starmer, called eradicating structural racism in the next Labour government a “defining cause” on the anniversary of George Floyd’s death.

Other shadow cabinet ministers including David Lammy and Marsha De Cordova also promised to campaign to tackle racism.

Shadow justice secretary Mr Lammy said: “George Floyd looked like me, he could have been me. That’s why his death reverberated around the world. People said: none of us can breathe when we still face the issues of structural racism in our lives every day.

“That’s why George Floyd‘s death sparked a global movement, from Minneapolis to Manchester to Mile End. Black and white people came together to say Black Lives Matter.”

Sir Keir highlighted how the coronavirus pandemic had also “brutally exposed” injustices in society.

“On the 25th of May 2020, not only did people see the violence on a street in Minneapolis but they could see the violence and destruction that structural racism was having on black communities in their own societies as a result of the pandemic,” Sir Keir said.

A Labour government would introduce a race equality act in an attempt to address inequalities and injustices that have been exposed by the Covid pandemic.

“The eradication of structural racism will be a defining cause for the next Labour government,” Sir Keir said.

Ms De Cordova said a Labour administration would introduce a new curriculum to allow young people “a balanced understanding of Britain’s past and how it has shaped society today.”

Additional reporting by PA

Half of Black people in Britain (49 per cent) think race relations have stayed the same since George Floyd’s murder last year which sparked a resurgence in Black Lives Matter protests, an exclusive YouGov poll suggests.

The survey indicated that some 42 per cent of all ethnic minority groups are of this opinion and 45 per cent of respondents to a national representative survey, of predominantly white people, held this view.

The vast majority of Black respondents (91 per cent) who believe there have been improvements in race relations in the past 12 months said it had quicker than it previously had.

Nadine White reports:

Last summer, as seismic protests erupted across the world following the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis, anti-racism flooded our social media feeds. Previously the domain of beach holidays, influencer sponcon and avocado brunches, suddenly, our screens were populated by sleek, 10-part PowerPoint-style slideshows on everything from defunding the police, to deaths in police custody, or how to be a better ally.

These graphics included data, quick facts, historical context, calls to action, then a sea of black squares (the hashtag #blackoutTuesday now has over 20 million posts), or guidance pointing to what the average reader could do to support the Black Lives Matter movement. In some ways, watching the shift felt bizarre. As someone who has been writing about anti-racism for years, I noticed that even people who I’d rarely seen post or engage with the issue of race, were willing to share these bitesize resources.

Micha Frazer-Carroll explains more:

UK campaigners are urging a crackdown on stop-and-search powers in the UK, one year on from the death of George Floyd in the US.

Currently in the UK police are able to search people and vehicles for drugs and or weapons without a warrant.

The killing of the African American Mr Floyd by a white police officer restarted the debate on the use of stop and search by the British police, over concerns that those from black and ethnic minority backgrounds tend to be disproportionately targeted.

Campaigners are now concerned that further sweeping powers have been proposed in the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill. These would allow police to stop and search those who have previously been convicted of carrying a knife, even if there was no reasonable suspicion.

Rachel Harger, a solicitor, explained to PA:  “Under the new policing bill the police will be able to stop and search individuals, who have previously been convicted of carrying an offensive weapon (even if they have not received a custodial sentence), without reasonable suspicion.”

Meanwhile, Human rights group Justice said they felt that greater restrictions are needed on stop and search to “avoid discriminating against our country’s ethnic minorities.” The group added that the Bill would “extend punishment from prison into the community, and risk further damaging confidence in the police.”