Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Row erupts over proposal to build Northern Ireland-shaped stone monument to mark centenary

Northern Ireland government body rejected plan after failing to reach ‘required consensus’

Matt Mathers
Thursday 18 March 2021 13:58 EDT
Comments
Stormont, where the Northern Ireland Assembly is located. Sinn Fein said the proposed monument ‘reflects only one political perspective’
Stormont, where the Northern Ireland Assembly is located. Sinn Fein said the proposed monument ‘reflects only one political perspective’ (EPA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A row has erupted over a proposal to build a stone monument at Stormont to mark Northern Ireland's centenary year.

Unionist parties submitted a proposal to a devolved government body asking it to consider plans for the monument to be erected within the grounds of Stormont.

But the Assembly Commission, which is made up of Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) from across the political spectrum, rejected the call.

The commission, which runs Northern Ireland’s government buildings, said it had been unable to reach the "required consensus" between parties.

In a joint statement the DUP, Ulster Unionists and Traditional Unionist Voice parties accused Sinn Fein of a "shameful exercise" in opposing the monument, adding they were "dismayed" at the commission's decision.

Read more:

But Sinn Fein, Northern Ireland's largest nationalist party – which campaigns for a united Ireland – said the monument "reflects only one political perspective".

The unionist parties, who want to remain part of the UK, said they believed the monument was "non-controversial".

The year 2021 marks 100 years since Northern Ireland was created by the partitioning of the island.

In a joint statement, DUP leader Arlene Foster, UUP leader Steve Aiken and TUV leader Jim Allister said the stone would not have cost any public money.

“We are dismayed by the refusal of the Commission to permit this project, which would not have cost the public purse as our respective parties and MLAs were committed to funding it,” they said.

They have claimed the refusal arose after Sinn Fein vetoed the proposal.

“This is the party that talks most about respect for all communities, but when a modest proposal was made on behalf of the wider unionist community it was callously vetoed,” they said.

A Sinn Fein spokesperson said unionist parties should have first discussed the proposal for the centenary stone with other political parties.

“Such an approach to the centenary of partition could embrace the very different perspectives of that event and how best to reflect these perspectives in an inclusive and respectful manner,” they said.

“Unfortunately, the proposed stone has been designed and commissioned by representatives of one tradition and reflects only one political perspective.”

The Social Democratic and Labour Party and Northern Ireland's cross-community party, Alliance, said they supported the proposal.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in