Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Brexit: DUP’s Arlene Foster and Sinn Fein politician trade blows in fresh row over Northern Ireland protocol

Heated exchanges came during first minister’s questions in NI Assembly

Matt Mathers
Tuesday 09 March 2021 10:36 EST
Comments
Ms Foster’s DUP is calling for the protocol to be scrapped
Ms Foster’s DUP is calling for the protocol to be scrapped (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A fresh row has broken out over the Northern Ireland protocol after a senior Sinn Fein politician accused Arlene Foster of colluding with loyalist paramilitaries in an attempt to have the post-Brexit trading arrangements scrapped.

The first minister and DUP leader, her deputy Lord Nigel Dodds and East Belfast MP Gavin Robinson held talks with the Loyalist Communities Council (LCC) last month to discuss opposition to the protocol, which they say has undermined NI’s constitutional place in the UK.

The LCC is an organisation that represents the views of the UVF, the UDA and the Red Hand Commandos – all of which are loyalist paramilitaries the UK Home Office has outlawed due to their links to terrorism.

Days after the meeting, the banned groups announced through the LCC that they were withdrawing their support for NI's historic Good Friday peace deal, which brought to an end three decades of bloody violence between loyalist and republican paramilitaries.

In a heated exchange during first minister's questions in the NI Assembly on Monday, John O’Dowd, MLA for Upper Bann, questioned whether it was appropriate for the first minister and senior DUP figures to hold a meeting with the LCC.

He said: "Do you not think the fact that you met representatives of these gangs that are actively now involved in criminality, drug dealing and murder undermines the message from the executive?"

He added: "You sat down with them seeking common cause in your opposition against the protocol."

Ms Foster responded by pointing out that Mr O'Dowd's own party has been linked to the IRA – a republican paramilitary that is also outlawed due to its links to terrorism. “I find it astounding to hear criticism from Sinn Fein when the Army Council is still in existence,” she said.

She added: "That is not my assessment, that is the assessment of the chief constable of the PSNI [Simon Byrne].

“It is very hard to take criticism from sources that should know better. What we want to do is to encourage everybody to engage in peaceful and constitutional politics... It really is astounding to hear members of Sinn Fein come out and criticise this party which has always condemned violence of any source."

The DUP and other unionist parties are pushing for the protocol to be axed, claiming it has driven an economic wedge between NI and the rest of the UK, thereby undermining the union.

NI's three pro-remain parties – Mr O’Dowd's Sinn Fein, the cross-community Alliance Party and the Social Democratic and Labour Party – are in favour of keeping the protocol.

They have accused unionist parties of failing to find workable solutions to some of the trade issues presented by the protocol. But unionists argue that it is unworkable in the long run and must be replaced.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in