Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Ben Wallace’s favourite defence blogger exposes real cost of Sunak’s National Service plan

A defence blogger and analyst beloved by former defence secretary Ben Wallace has questioned key details about Sunak’s National Service plan

David Maddox
Political editor
Sunday 26 May 2024 15:37 EDT
Comments
Rishi Sunak justifies introducing National Service: 'Democratic values are under threat'

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A former army reservist whose blog has been praised by ex-defence secretary Ben Wallace has ripped apart Rishi Sunak’s plans to reintroduce National Service.

The author of the Thinpinstripe blog is a former civil servant at the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and writes under the pseudonym “Sir Humphry”.

His analysis of the Tory pledge to add 30,000 teenagers to the armed forces ranks every year has raised serious questions about the costs of the project.

He warned that bringing an extra 30,000 people into the armed forces would require a roughly 300 percent expansion of the military training pipeline.

Rishi Sunak speaks with British troops in April (PA)
Rishi Sunak speaks with British troops in April (PA) (PA Wire)

He claimed that this means the scheme would require “a significant increase in the military training estate”.

This, according to the analysis, would require training up the “equivalent to the entire annual British military training output every 13 weeks.”

He also warned that the “army has significantly downsized its estate and does not have the ability to train 30,000 people per year as a basic training system.”

Training 300 percent more recruits could “have a direct impact on how the regular military manage and operate their training schedule,” it is claimed.

He also noted that “it is challenging to see’ how the Royal Corps of Signals could take in thousands of extra people in each year due to their size.”

At a time when much much military housing is already below standing, the analysis predicts that the MoD would have to supply a 50 percent increase in Army accommodation, which based on the cost for new bed spaces could cost £4.8bn just on accommodation.

Former defence Secretary Ben Wallace is stepping down as an MP (Kirsty O’Connor/PA)
Former defence Secretary Ben Wallace is stepping down as an MP (Kirsty O’Connor/PA) (PA Archive)

This would also mean that the scheme could have an impact on the Government's vetting capabilities.

Sir Humphry also claimed that just establishing training units directly could cost as much as £1.5bn per year, leaving only £1bn for everything else.

He concluded that: “Brought together, in rough terms, it's hard to see how this policy could be delivered for the stated cost of £2.5bn per year given that even rough calculations are showing that it would cost billions more to deliver both short and long term.”

Previously, Mr Wallace, when he was the Tory defence secretary, has praised this blogger.

Two days ago on X (formerly Twitter) replied to “Sir Humphrey wishing him well in life after parliament, stating: “You can't be bettered and you have always been the voice of reason and exposed the reality behind so many over sensationalised stories. You may not realise it but your blogs helped me to be a better SoS Defence.”

Labour have branded the new National Service policy a “gimmick”.

But home secretary James Cleverly said the plans were aimed at getting young people "out of their bubble" and would not involve the threat of criminal sanctions for those who refuse to comply.

Rishi Sunak pledged to get 18-year-olds to either join the military for 12 months or do "volunteer" work one weekend a month for a year.

The Prime Minister said the policy would help unite society in an "increasingly uncertain world" and give young people a "shared sense of purpose".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in