Autumn Statement: Energy price cap increase dampens Hunt’s ‘tax cuts’ as he denies pre-election handout – live

Prior to his career in parliament, Mr Hunt attended Charterhouse School in Godalming and received a first-class degree in philosophy, politics and economics at Oxford before working as an English teacher in Japan.

In 1991, aged 25, he co-founded a business with a childhood friend:

Jeremy Hunt’s tax cuts amid uncertain times are “not a recipe for good management of the public finances”, one of the UK’s top think tanks has warned, Archie Mitchell reports.

The influential Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) said “the prudent thing to do” would have been to use the financial headroom to “build a larger buffer into his plans”. Instead Mr Hunt relied on the government’s “poorly designed and loose fiscal target” to pay for tax cuts which will hamstring whoever is chancellor after the next election, it said.

“That might make for good politics. It does not make for good policymaking,” IFS director Paul Johnson added.

In a scathing verdict on Mr Hunt’s autumn statement, Mr Johnson said: “There’s a material risk that those plans prove undeliverable and today’s tax cuts will not prove to be sustainable.”

And he noted that despite the significant cut to national insurance, “these tax cuts won’t be enough to prevent this from being the biggest tax raising parliament in modern times”.

From universal credit to pensions and a fresh crackdown on benefit claimants who do not find work within 18 months, here are the effects on state benefits:

While Jeremy Hunt boasted about giving out the biggest tax cut since the 1980s, the official spending watchdog revealed Rishi Sunak would take in £200bn in a stealth tax bombshell.

The prime minister’s decision to freeze the threshold at which people pay national insurance and other taxes will cost £200bn in the next six years, the Office for Budget Responsibility said.

In a budget which many said would give with one hand while taking with the other, the cost of “personal tax threshold measures” was laid bare.

Freezing tax thresholds drags more people into paying tax, and means those that do are pulled into higher tax bands as their pay rises with inflation.

This financial year the decision to freeze tax thresholds will cost £12.4bn, with that figure climbing to £44.6bn by 2028-29.

Money-saving expert Martin Lewis said the cut to National Insurance goes some way to cover the cost of freezing tax thresholds but lamented the absence of Lifetime ISA reform:

Stephanie Flanders, head of economics at Bloomberg, said the predicted spending cuts in future years would leave a “ticking time bomb” for whoever is in charge in the next parliament.

The Office for Budgetary Responsibility (OBR) said Jeremy Hunt had spent “virtually all” of the £27bn-worth of “fiscal headroom” – mainly on the £21bn cost of tax cuts, plus some more on the cost of welfare reforms.

It also warned that the windfall spent on tax cuts was “mainly a reflection of a £19.1bn erosion in the real value of departmental spending”.

The OBR said “a 2.3 per cent-a-year real-terms fall in day-to-day spending” would “present challenges” – polite speak for painful spending cuts.

Ian Mulheirn, an economist at the Resolution Foundation think tank, said it showed the “completely implausible implications” of the tax cuts.

Jeremy Hunt’s tax cuts amid uncertain times are “not a recipe for good management of the public finances”, one of the UK’s top think tanks has warned.

The influential Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) said “the prudent thing to do” would have been to use the financial headroom to “build a larger buffer into his plans”. Instead Mr Hunt relied on the government’s “poorly designed and loose fiscal target” to pay for tax cuts that will hamstring whoever is chancellor after the next election, it said.

“That might make for good politics. It does not make for good policymaking,” IFS director Paul Johnson added.

In a scathing verdict on Mr Hunt’s autumn statement, Mr Johnson said: “There’s a material risk that those plans prove undeliverable and today’s tax cuts will not prove to be sustainable.”

And he noted that despite the significant cut to national insurance, “these tax cuts won’t be enough to prevent this from being the biggest tax-raising parliament in modern times”.

House prices are set to fall by thousands of pounds next year as interest rates remain high, forecasters have said: