Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Johnson has ‘full confidence’ in Patel despite clash over pandemic border closures

Prime minister refuses to tell MPs why he overruled home secretary

Andrew Woodcock,Rob Merrick
Wednesday 20 January 2021 10:30 EST
Comments
Boris Johnson refuses to say why he kept UK borders open when pandemic started

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Downing Street has said Boris Johnson continues to have “full confidence” in Priti Patel, after the home secretary revealed they clashed last spring over the decision not to close UK borders at the start of the coronavirus pandemic.

Following Ms Patel’s astonishing revelation last night that she recommended barring entry from abroad in March 2020, Mr Johnson refused to tell MPs why he overruled her advice.

Put under pressure at Prime Minister’s Questions in the House of Commons, the prime minister twice ducked the question.

But his official spokesperson later told reporters that the government’s decisions on coronavirus restrictions had at all times been “based on the best scientific evidence and data available”, suggesting that Ms Patel’s position was counter to the prime minster’s assessment of that evidence.

The spokesperson nevertheless said the PM continued to have “full confidence” in Ms Patel as home secretary.

The fateful decision – taken without “any scientific evidence” to justify it, an investigation later found – is blamed for making the Covid-19 death toll “far worse” than if restrictions had been imposed.

It meant hundreds of Covid-infected passengers arrived every day – particularly from Spain, Italy and France – as the UK stood “almost unique” in rejecting border checks, a report by MPs said.

The controversy has been reignited after Ms Patel told Tory supporters: “On ‘should we have closed our borders earlier?’, the answer is yes. I was an advocate of closing them last March.”

Instead, as the coronavirus ripped through the UK, ministers abandoned asking people to quarantine for two weeks after arriving from infection blackspots, such as Hubei province in China, and Italy.

In the Commons, Sir Keir Starmer demanded to know: “Why did he overrule his home secretary, who claims she said last March that we should shut down borders?”

But Mr Johnson refused to answer, instead branding the Labour leader “Captain Hindsight” for not having called for border closures himself last March.

Outside the Commons, Nigel Farage also piled on the pressure, tweeting: “What a pity Boris Johnson didn’t listen to Priti Patel.”

Almost 1.7 million passengers arrived in the UK in the first week of March last year and, even in the week ending 22 March – days before the lockdown was finally imposed – almost 600,000 did so.

In the crucial 10 days between scrapping isolation guidance and the lockdown, up to 10,000 infected people arrived, an investigation by the Commons Home Affairs Committee found.

Mr Johnson was also unable to answer questions posed about the blunder that saw the Home Office delete hundreds of thousands of criminal records.

Sir Keir said: “It's 10 days since the Home Office mistakenly deleted hundreds of thousands of vital criminal records, including fingerprints, crime scene data and DNA records.

“So can the prime minister tell the house how many criminal investigations could have been damaged by this mistake?”

The prime minister replied: “We don't know how many cases might be frustrated as a result of what has happened.

“But I can tell him there are 213,000 offence records, 5,000 arrest records and 15,000 person records currently being investigated because they are the subject of this problem.”

Mr Johnson said the Home Office “believe that they will be able to rectify the results of this complex incident and they hope very much that they’ll be able to restore the data in question.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in