Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Boris Johnson refuses to say why he overruled Priti Patel and kept UK borders open when pandemic started

Home Secretary has told Tory supporters ‘Should we have closed our borders earlier? The answer is yes’

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Wednesday 20 January 2021 09:26 EST
Comments
Boris Johnson refuses to say why he kept UK borders open when pandemic started

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Boris Johnson has refused to say why he overruled Priti Patel and kept UK borders open when the pandemic broke out.

Put under pressure in the Commons – after the Home Secretary’s astonishing revelation that she recommended closure last March – the prime minister twice ducked the question.

The fateful decision – taken without “any scientific evidence” to justify it, an investigation later found – is blamed for making the Covid-19 death toll “far worse” than if restrictions had been imposed.

It meant hundreds of Covid-infected passengers arrived every day – particularly from Spain, Italy and France – as the UK stood “almost unique” in rejecting border checks, a report by MPs said.

The controversy has been reignited after Ms Patel told Tory supporters: “On 'should we have closed our borders earlier', the answer is yes. I was an advocate of closing them last March.”

Instead, as coronavirus ripped through the UK, ministers abandoned asking people to quarantine for two weeks after arriving infection blackspots, such as Hubei province in China and Italy.

In the Commons, Keir Starmer demanded to know: “Why did he overrule his Home Secretary, who claims she said, last March, that we should shut down borders?”

But Mr Johnson refused to answer, instead branding the Labour leader “Captain Hindsight” for not having called for border closures himself, last March.

Speaking to reporters later, Mr Johnson’s official spokesman said that the government’s decisions had at all times been “based on the best scientific evidence and data available”, suggesting that Ms Patel’s support for closing borders was counter to the government’s assessment of that evidence.

But the spokesman said the PM continued to have “full confidence” in her as home secretary.

Outside the Commons, Nigel Farage also piled on the pressure, tweeting: “What a pity Boris Johnson didn’t listen to Priti Patel.”

Almost 1.7 million passengers arrived in the UK in the first week of March last year and, even in the week ending 22 March – days before the lockdown was finally imposed – almost 600,000 did so.

In the crucial ten days between scrapping isolation guidance and the lockdown, up to 10,000 infected people arrived, an investigation by the Commons Home Affairs Committee found.

Mr Johnson was also unable to answer questions posed about the blunder that saw the Home Office delete hundreds of thousands of criminal records

Sir Keir said: “It's 10 days since the Home Office mistakenly deleted hundreds of thousands of vital criminal records, including fingerprints, crime scene data and DNA records.

“So can the Prime Minister tell the House how many criminal investigations could have been damaged by this mistake?”

The Prime Minister replied: “We don't know how many cases might be frustrated as a result of what has happened.

“But I can tell him there are 213,000 offence records, 5,000 arrest records and 15,000 person records currently being investigated because they are the subject of this problem.”

Mr Johnson said the Home Office “believe that they will be able to rectify the results of this complex incident and they hope very much that they'll be able to restore the data in question”.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in