Stay up to date with notifications from TheĀ Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Ministers accused of hiding cost of retaining key airbase under Chagos Islands deal

Exclusive: Government accused of holding back information on cost to the taxpayer of maintaining UK-US Diego Garcia airbase

David Maddox,Millie Cooke
Monday 18 November 2024 08:48 EST
Comments
āœ•
Close
Farage issues Chagos Island warning: ā€˜There is outright hostility to this dealā€™

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Ministers have been accused of hiding the cost of a deal to hand the Chagos Islands back to Mauritius after questions were raised about how much the UK will pay to retain a strategically-important military base on the archipelago.

With revelations that Donald Trump is looking for a way to veto the deal struck by foreign secretary David Lammy because of concerns over the airbase on Diego Garcia island, the Labour government is facing calls to publish the costs to the taxpayer of the deal.

As part of the agreement, the UK and US believe they have secured use of the airbase for at least 99 years, but have so far refused to publish how much they will pay to be allowed to use it.

Answering an urgent question last week, Foreign Office minister Stephen Doughty told MPs it was not normal practice to reveal the value of payments made by the UK for military bases across the globe due to security risks.

Foreign Office minister in the Lords, Baroness Jenny Chapman also said: ā€œWe never reveal the cost of basing our military assets overseasā€”we never have, we never will, and I do not think other nations do either. There are very good reasons for that. If we started to do so, I expect we would see the prices of these things start to go up fairly rapidly. No, we will not be disclosing that."

Stephen Doughty answered an urgent question last week
Stephen Doughty answered an urgent question last week (House of Commons/UK Parliament/PA Wire)

However, previous written answers and statements showed that the government has published the costs of bases.

A year ago in November 2023, the government published the Ā£256 million cost of its Cyprus military bases. In November 2022, the government also published the annual running costs of the same bases.

Last month the government also published the Ā£27 million annual cost of the British army training facility in Kenya.

And in 2015, the then-defence minister Penny Mordaunt published the annual running costs of all Britainā€™s overseas bases.

Tory shadow ministers have now accused the governement of attempting to hold back vital details on the Mauritius deal on Chagos to avoid embarrassment as they come under pressure from president election Trump.

Tory shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge said: ā€œ[Defence secretary]John Healy confirmed that he knows how much it will cost to rent back the military base on Chagos that we currently own - but heā€™s refusing to tell us the figure. What is he trying to hide?

Mark Francois (Gareth Fuller/PA)
Mark Francois (Gareth Fuller/PA) (PA Archive)

ā€œWe know this money could be hundreds of millions that would have to be found from the MoD budget, that should instead be focused on strengthening our armed forces. Weā€™ve had confused reasons as to why the Government isnā€™t going to tell us. The fact is this is public money and the Government need to be transparent on the cost of their Chagos deal, and stop hiding the truth from Parliament.ā€

Pressed on the issue by The Independent, a Downing Street spokesperson said: ā€œWe will be finalising the details and the legal text as part of the deal and then coming forward with the details for scrutiny and treaty ratification in the usual way, and its at that point that we will set out the full details of it, including the costs"

Pressed further on whether Stephen Doughty was right to say that its ā€˜not normal practiceā€™ to publish the financial arrangements, spox said: ā€œAs I said, we will set out the full details of the treaty which includes cost at that point so weā€™re following the treaty process on this.ā€

The issue is likely to be raised today in defence questions by the Tories.

Shadow armed forces minister, Mark Francois, said: ā€œJust as with farming, Labour are now utterly all over the place on the costs of the Chagos Deal, too. Last Monday, FCDO Minister Stephen Doughty, told the Commons categorically the Government would not release the costs of the deal and yet on Friday the official No 10 spokesman said they would release the ā€˜full details, including the costsā€™ of the deal, when the Treaty is published.

ā€œThe government are in complete Chagos chaos over this.ā€

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in