Brexit bill - as it happened: Government accused of 'cover up' as Labour vows to force release of secret papers
Follow all the latest updates from Westminster here
Your support helps us to tell the story
My recent work focusing on Latino voters in Arizona has shown me how crucial independent journalism is in giving voice to underrepresented communities.
Your support is what allows us to tell these stories, bringing attention to the issues that are often overlooked. Without your contributions, these voices might not be heard.
Every dollar you give helps us continue to shine a light on these critical issues in the run up to the election and beyond
Eric Garcia
Washington Bureau Chief
Peers in the House of Lords have started the lengthy process of scrutinising Theresa May’s flagship Brexit legislation.
It comes after an influential committee in the Lords warned that the legislation – in its current form – is constitutionally unacceptable and will need to be substantially rewritten.
More than 190 members had lined up to speak during the two-day debate on the Bill’s second reading. During the first round of debates, on Tuesday, one of the best interventions came from the former Brexit minister Lord Bridges.
He challenged the Prime Minister to make clear what sort of relationship the Government wanted with the EU after Brexit, adding ministers have so far provided “no clear answers”, offering only “conflicting, confusing voices”.
He told peers he feared the Government would come up with “meaningless waffle” for its future relationship with Brussels, and that the implementation period would be “a gangplank into thin air”.
In the Commons – as Ms May headed for China on an official visit - Labour’s Shadow Brexit Secretary raised an urgent question following a leak of the Government’s Brexit impact assessments on Monday evening. The papers claimed that Britain will be worse off after leaving the bloc regardless of the deal.
Labour have now vowed to win a Commons vote to force the release of the secret analysis laying bare the economic damage from Brexit, as the affair was branded a “cover up” by one MP.
Speaker John Bercow has granted an urgent question in the House of Commons on the Government's analysis of the long-term economic impact of Brexit upon the economy.
It is expected to take place from 12.30pm and will be asked by shadow Brexit secretary Sir Keir Starmer.
Conservative peer Lord Hill says the EU Withdrawal Bill is "in someways, a boring Bill"
"We're experts at being boring," he adds.
Lady Smith said: "We all want to avoid this becoming a fiendishly complex process that weakens both parliamentary sovereignty and legal protections that our citizens rightly take as granted."
But she stressed the need to amend the legislation to provide greater clarity, and mocked the Prime Minister for arguing for a "clean bill", as if somehow amendments made "legislation dirty and impure".
She warned: "The process of Brexit is too important and too complex to be left to those who have no doubt, because only doubt brings questioning. And it is only through questioning that we examine an issue enough to get the detail right."
Lib Dem peer Lord Wallace has just took aim at the "unelected journalists" at the Daily Mail and Telegraph.
Quite a bizarre description for a member of the House of Lords.
From the Number 10 briefing just now on the leaked Brexit impact papers, a spokesman for the Prime Minister says the analysis was “initial work not approved by ministers” and only considered off the shelf scenarios rather than the bespoke deal the Government hopes to strike with the EU.
Lord Mandleson is now speaking. He says the government cannot behave as if it has a blank cheque to take the UK out of the EU in any vandalistic way it chooses
"He clearly wants all the trade benefits of the single market without actually being in it - I admire his ambition. But like the Prime Minister he is trying to dance on the head of a pig that does not exist."
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments