Brexit bill - as it happened: Government accused of 'cover up' as Labour vows to force release of secret papers
Follow all the latest updates from Westminster here
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Peers in the House of Lords have started the lengthy process of scrutinising Theresa May’s flagship Brexit legislation.
It comes after an influential committee in the Lords warned that the legislation – in its current form – is constitutionally unacceptable and will need to be substantially rewritten.
More than 190 members had lined up to speak during the two-day debate on the Bill’s second reading. During the first round of debates, on Tuesday, one of the best interventions came from the former Brexit minister Lord Bridges.
He challenged the Prime Minister to make clear what sort of relationship the Government wanted with the EU after Brexit, adding ministers have so far provided “no clear answers”, offering only “conflicting, confusing voices”.
He told peers he feared the Government would come up with “meaningless waffle” for its future relationship with Brussels, and that the implementation period would be “a gangplank into thin air”.
In the Commons – as Ms May headed for China on an official visit - Labour’s Shadow Brexit Secretary raised an urgent question following a leak of the Government’s Brexit impact assessments on Monday evening. The papers claimed that Britain will be worse off after leaving the bloc regardless of the deal.
Labour have now vowed to win a Commons vote to force the release of the secret analysis laying bare the economic damage from Brexit, as the affair was branded a “cover up” by one MP.
Speaker John Bercow has granted an urgent question in the House of Commons on the Government's analysis of the long-term economic impact of Brexit upon the economy.
It is expected to take place from 12.30pm and will be asked by shadow Brexit secretary Sir Keir Starmer.
Conservative peer Lord Hill says the EU Withdrawal Bill is "in someways, a boring Bill"
"We're experts at being boring," he adds.
Lady Smith said: "We all want to avoid this becoming a fiendishly complex process that weakens both parliamentary sovereignty and legal protections that our citizens rightly take as granted."
But she stressed the need to amend the legislation to provide greater clarity, and mocked the Prime Minister for arguing for a "clean bill", as if somehow amendments made "legislation dirty and impure".
She warned: "The process of Brexit is too important and too complex to be left to those who have no doubt, because only doubt brings questioning. And it is only through questioning that we examine an issue enough to get the detail right."
Lib Dem peer Lord Wallace has just took aim at the "unelected journalists" at the Daily Mail and Telegraph.
Quite a bizarre description for a member of the House of Lords.
From the Number 10 briefing just now on the leaked Brexit impact papers, a spokesman for the Prime Minister says the analysis was “initial work not approved by ministers” and only considered off the shelf scenarios rather than the bespoke deal the Government hopes to strike with the EU.
Lord Mandleson is now speaking. He says the government cannot behave as if it has a blank cheque to take the UK out of the EU in any vandalistic way it chooses
"He clearly wants all the trade benefits of the single market without actually being in it - I admire his ambition. But like the Prime Minister he is trying to dance on the head of a pig that does not exist."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments