Brexit legal challenge: 'A six year old child could see flaws in Government's Brexit plans', Supreme Court told
Fourth and final day of the Supreme Court Brexit legal challenge has been heard and the judges have now retired to consider their decision
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government's Brexit plans are so flawed "even a six year old child could see it", the Supreme Court has been told.
The claims were made by Richard Gordon QC, Law Officer of the Welsh Government, who told the court Welsh politicians should be allowed to approve plans to trigger Article 50.
The Supreme Court was hearing final arguments in the Brexit legal challenge as the case entered its fourth and final day.
Opponents to the Government's Brexit plans outlined their case; with representatives of Wales, Scotland, ex-pats and children's rights putting their case to judges.
The Government's lawyers then had their final opportunity to refute the claims and make their case that Theresa May has sufficient authority to trigger Article 50 without a vote from MPs. The argued the 2015 Referendum Act which outlined the terms of the EU referendum did not specify who could trigger Article 50.
Latest updates:
- Theresa May admits EU leaders will try to 'punish' UK in Brexit negotiations
- Welsh Government's lawyer tells court Brexit 'has split the UK into four parts' and is 'one of the most divisive political events in decades'
- Labour hit by backbench revolt over Article 50 Tory 'trap' fears
- EU judges to decide on UK cases for years after Brexit
- Scotland and Northern Ireland must approve Article 50, Supreme Court told
Please wait a moment for the live blog to load:
All 11 of the Supreme Court justices, who are the most senior judges in the UK, heard the case and have now retired to reach their decision.
A judgment is expected to be announced early in the new year.
"There was an opposition debate in October and an opposition debate set down for Wednesday"
At no point has primary legislation been proposed by MPs in parliament on Brexit, Eadie says
Govt lawyer arguing MPs don't actually want Article 50 vote "Parliament does not seem to want the obligation the court has thrust upon them"
"The courts will be posing a new control of a most contentious kind" if it rules Theresa May doesn't have power to trigger A50 alone- Eadie
James Eadie QC has now finished putting his case on behalf of the government
Now up is Lord Keen QC, Advocate General for Scotland, also representing the government
He's expected to spend the next hour or so discussing how Brexit and Article 50 will impact on the devolved regions of the UK
Of course, as we know, a majority of people in the UK as a whole voted for Brexit, but Scotland and Northern Ireland did not
In addition, as Scotland, Wales & Northern Ireland have their own devolved parliaments, if Theresa May triggers Article 50 she bypasses them
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments