Brexit legal challenge live: British citizens will lose rights through EU withdrawal, Supreme Court told
A third day of arguments has been made in the Brexit Supreme Court appeal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Gina Miller's legal representative has outlining the case against the Government in day three of the four day Supreme Court appeal on Brexit.
Lord Pannick QC represented Ms Miller and told the court Theresa May does not have sufficient authority to trigger Article 50 and instead the case must go to MPs.
Representing fello claimant Deir Dos Santos, a hairdresser born in Brazil, QC Dominic Chambers told the court only parliament has the power to take away British citizens' rights, which EU withdrawal would inevitably do.
The court was also told both Scotland and Northern Ireland must approve triggering Article 50 before the Government does so. A majority of people in Scotland (62 per cent) and Northern Ireland (56 per cent) voted to Remain.
The day before, while the court was sitting, Ms May announced during a visit to the Gulf that she will reveal her Brexit plans before triggering Article 50, in what appears to be a signifcant U-turn on her previous position.
Catch up on everything that happened in court today:
The Prime Minister has previously said she plans to trigger Article 50 by the end of this Spring.
If MPs are entitled to vote on Article 50, it could delay Brexit considerably or ensure it is a 'soft Brexit' rather than a 'hard Brexit' as politicians could insist protectionist clauses are inserted before EU withdrawal.
The Supreme Court case is expected to last four days.
A judgment is anticipated for early in the new year.
We'll also be hearing from representatives of Welsh government, a representative of British expats and a representative of children's rights
Then in the afternoon, the Government's lawyer James Eadie QC will return to offer his final rebuttals on behalf of Theresa May
Crowded funded Peoples' Challenge includes representation of Gibraltar. Due to hear from them tomorrow twitter.com/Kor1748/status…
During 14 hrs 15 mins of Brexit Supreme Court case so farMen have spoken for: 14 hrs 11 mins 17 secsWomen have spoken for: 3 mins 43 secs
If anyone would like more indepth analysis of the Brexit Supreme Court case and Northern Ireland, let me know and I can do a column on it
I was a Westminster parliamentary assistant for a Belfast constituency under the first year of the Lib-Con coalition back in the day
So I know more on trivia on Northern Irish parity legislation/ devolution than most sensible people ought to
You can catch up on all my coverage of the Supreme Court Brexit case for The Independent here: independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi…
A quick recap of some significant Brexit news which has happened while we've been in court today...
A man has been arrested on suspicion of 'sending online threats' to Gina Miller- a claimant in the Brexit case independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/…
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments