Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

As it happenedended1478198333

Brexit legal challenge: Theresa May needs parliamentary approval to trigger Article 50, High Court rules – as it happened

Historic case hands Parliament opportunity to challenge, or even delay, the process of leaving the European Union

Andrew Griffin
London
,Samuel Osborne,Siobhan Fenton
Thursday 03 November 2016 06:38 EDT
Comments
Gina Miller gives statement after High Court rules triggering article 50 must go through parliament

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The High Court has ruled on whether Theresa May cannot bypass Parliament when she triggers Britain’s exit from the European Union.

Here are the latest updates:

Campaigners have won their High Court battle over Theresa May's decision to use the royal prerogative in her Brexit strategy.

In one of the most important constitutional cases in generations, three senior judges ruled the Prime Minister does not have power to use the prerogative to trigger Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty to start the UK's exit from the European Union - without the prior authority of Parliament.

The ruling against the Government was made by Lord Chief Justice Lord Thomas, sitting with two other senior judges in London.

The Government has been given the go-ahead to appeal against the ruling at the Supreme Court.

Judgment: R (Miller) -V- Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union

Judgment: R (Miller) -V- Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union

Unless overturned on appeal at the Supreme Court, the ruling threatens to plunge the Government's plans for Brexit into disarray as the process will have to be subject to full parliamentary control.

Government lawyers had argued that prerogative powers were a legitimate way to give effect "to the will of the people" who voted by a clear majority to leave the European Union in the June referendum.

But the Lord Chief Justice declared: "The Government does not have power under the Crown's prerogative to give notice pursuant to Article 50 for the UK to withdraw from the European Union."

The Government has been given the go-ahead to appeal against the ruling at the Supreme Court but made no immediate announcement about whether it will.

1478167718

The High Court has ruled Theresa May's government cannot trigger Article 50 through the use of the royal prerogative. 

Samuel Osborne3 November 2016 10:08
1478167726

Samuel Osborne3 November 2016 10:08
1478167744

The High Court has ruled the government must get parliamentary approval to trigger Article 50.

Samuel Osborne3 November 2016 10:09
1478167955

The Government has said it will appeal the High Court's decision.

Samuel Osborne3 November 2016 10:12
1478168020

You can read the judgement in full here.

Samuel Osborne3 November 2016 10:13
1478168069

The Government's lawyer says the Supreme Court has set aside the 5th and 8th of December for hearing their appeal against the ruling.

Samuel Osborne3 November 2016 10:14
1478168225
Samuel Osborne3 November 2016 10:17
1478168245

The Government has been given the go-ahead to appeal against the ruling at the Supreme Court.

Samuel Osborne3 November 2016 10:17
1478168599
Samuel Osborne3 November 2016 10:23
1478168702

Samuel Osborne3 November 2016 10:25

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in