Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Johnson and Sunak feud descends into warfare as they trade blows over resignation honours

The row between Mr Sunak and his predecessor descended into further acrimony

Archie Mitchell
Monday 12 June 2023 11:10 EDT
Comments
Rishi Sunak: Boris Johnson 'asked me to do something I wasn't prepared to do'

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The row between Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak today descended into a open warfare as the former PM accused his successor of ā€œtalking rubbishā€ about the resignation honours list saga.

Mr Johnson hit back at the prime minister after Mr Sunak accused his one-time ally of asking him to ā€œdo something I wasnā€™t prepared to doā€ by bending the rules on peerages.

In his first public comments since Mr Johnson quit as MP, a defiant Mr Sunak claimed Mr Johnson asked him to either overrule the committee which vets peerages - known as Holac - or ā€œmake promises to peopleā€ on the issue.

Mr Sunak claimed he was ā€œnot prepared to do thatā€ because he didnā€™t think it was ā€œrightā€. Ramping up his message, he added: ā€œIf people donā€™t like that, then tough.ā€

But Mr Johnson responded hours later, saying that all Mr Sunak needed to do was ask Holac to ā€œrenew their vettingā€.

He said in a statement: ā€œRishi Sunak is talking rubbish. To honour these peerages it was not necessary to overrule Holac - but simply to ask them to renew their vetting, which was a mere formality.ā€

Mr Johnson and his allies blame Downing Street for some of his key Tory allies - including Nadine Dorries, Alok Sharma and Nigel Evans - failing to appear on the former prime ministerā€™s resignation honours list.

As well as Mr Johnson, the saga prompted the resignation of Ms Dorries and Ms Adams, triggering three challenging by-elections for the Prime Minister as his party trails in the polls.

Speaking at the London Tech Week conference, Mr Sunak said: ā€œBoris Johnson asked me to do something that I wasnā€™t prepared to do because I didnā€™t think it was right.

ā€œThat was to either overrule the Holac (House of Lords Appointments Commission) committee or to make promises to people.

ā€œNow, I wasnā€™t prepared to do that. I didnā€™t think it was right and if people donā€™t like that, then tough.

ā€œWhen I got this job I said I was going to do things differently because I wanted to change politics and thatā€™s what Iā€™m doing.ā€

After Mr Sunakā€™s comments, an ally of Mr Johnson fired back by accusing Mr Sunak of having ā€œsecretly blockedā€ a handful of peerages.

Downing Street later said Mr Sunak does not regret the comments he made at the event. A spokesman said: ā€œHe was asked a direct question. He gave a clear answer.ā€

There have been claims that Mr Johnson reached a ā€œgentlemanā€™s agreementā€ with Mr Sunak that he would wave through the honours list and allow the MPs to be re-vetted by Holac at a later date so they would not have to stand down now.

But Mr Johnsonā€™s camp has accused his successor of breaking the deal that has now enflamed tensions.

Government figures have insisted neither Mr Sunak nor Downing Street removed names from Mr Johnsonā€™s peerages submission. Michael Gove stressed on Monday that the ā€œappropriate procedureā€ and the correct ā€œprecedentā€ was followed.

Meanwhile Downing Street said it is is ā€œentirely untrueā€ that Rishi Sunak or members of his No 10 team removed names from Boris Johnsonā€™s peerages submission.

Levelling Up Secretary Michael Gove said the ā€˜appropriate procedureā€™ and the correct ā€˜precedentā€™ was followed
Levelling Up Secretary Michael Gove said the ā€˜appropriate procedureā€™ and the correct ā€˜precedentā€™ was followed (PA Wire)

Asked if anyone in No 10 spoke to the House of Lords Appointments Commission (Holac) before it made its redactions to Mr Johnsonā€™s list, the Prime Ministerā€™s official spokesman told reporters: ā€œIt is entirely untrue to say that anyone from No 10 attempted to remove or change or alter Holacā€™s list.ā€

The official noted that ā€œthis is a process for Holac to make a decisionā€ and said that ā€œwhen it comes to peerages, the final list comes to the Prime Ministerā€.

Asked whether Mr Sunak broke a deal with his predecessor under which he would have waved through the honours list ā€“ as has been suggested by Mr Johnsonā€™s camp ā€“ the spokesman pointed to the Prime Ministerā€™s comments on Monday morning, when he said Mr Johnson asked him to ā€œdo something I wasnā€™t prepared to doā€ by overruling Holac.

Holac, which Mr Johnson himself overruled while in No 10 over the peerage of Tory donor Peter Cruddas, has confirmed it did not support eight nominees put forward by the ex-leader.

On Saturday, Downing Street took the decision on Saturday to declassify Holac chairman Lord Bewā€™s approved names to Mr Sunak.

The letter, dated February 5, contains the seven peerages announced on Friday, along with a redacted name of a person who took the ā€œpersonal decision to withdraw themselvesā€.

The row came as the Privileges Committee met to conclude its inquiry into whether the former prime minister misled Parliament over No 10 lockdown parties.

MPs have pledged to continue the investigation process despite Mr Johnsonā€™s Commons exit amid accusations of a ā€œwitch huntā€. But Downing Street has backed the committee, insisting is is ā€œdoing exactly what Parliament askedā€.

The prime ministerā€™s spokesman said: ā€œThis is a properly set-up committee that the House has voted to carry out their work ā€¦ The government will in no way traduce or criticise the work of the committee.ā€

The panel is set to meet in Westminster on Monday with a view to deciding when to publish its report.

There has been speculation that the seven-person committee, which is chaired by veteran Labour MP Harriet Harman but has a Conservative majority, could release its findings in a matter of days.

The probe is thought to have ruled that Mr Johnson lied to Parliament when he told MPs Covid rules were followed in Downing Street despite boozy parties taking place while social distancing restrictions were in place.

Mr Johnson accused the committee of ā€œbiasā€ and likened it to a ā€œkangaroo courtā€.

The Privileges Committee, in response, said Mr Johnson ā€œimpugned the integrity of the Houseā€ with his attack.

Meanwhile, as the row between Mr Johnson and Mr Sunak intensified, the former prime minister lashed out at the government for ā€œfoot-draggingā€ with an attempt to stop his unredacted WhatsApp messages being released to the Covid inquiry.

The former prime minister said the governmentā€™s judicial review against the inquiry is wasting ā€œpublic time and moneyā€ and ā€œfrustrating the inquiryā€™s workā€.

The Cabinet Office has launched a High Court challenge against inquiry chairwoman Baroness Hallettā€™s request for the wholesale handover of Mr Johnsonā€™s messages and notebooks from the pandemic.

The Cabinet Office says some of the information requested by the inquiry does not relate to the Governmentā€™s handling of coronavirus and is ā€œunambiguously irrelevantā€.

But Baroness Hallett, a former judge, has said she should be able to decide what is relevant.

Mr Johnson has offered to bypass the Cabinet Office and give information straight to Baroness Hallett to review.

He told The Times: ā€œThe Cabinet Office has blocked me from directly sharing unredacted material with the inquiry ā€” despite my repeated attempts to do so.

ā€œThe government wants the whole matter to be decided by the courts, even though government ministers are on record saying that litigation is pointless because the government will not win.

ā€œThe Cabinet Officeā€™s foot-dragging approach to the inquiry is costing public time and money.ā€

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in