Boris Johnson news: More than half of Britons ‘think Tories made wrong decision keeping PM’
One in four 2019 Conservative voters says he should have stepped down
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.More than half of Britons think the Conservative party made the wrong decision in backing Boris Johnson’s premiership in the confidence vote earlier this week, a poll has found.
Mr Johnson described his victory as “decisive”, despite winning the ballot by 211 votes to 148.
But critics say the prime minister has found himself in the eye of a revolt against his positon, the scale of which far surpassed the expectations of his allies - failing to put to bed questions over his leadership.
On Friday, an Ipsos poll found that 51 per cent of Britons think MPs slipped up in retaining the prime minister, a number which includes one in four 2019 Conservative voters.
And, overall, 36 per cent said they made the right decision.
Earlier, the government’s top social mobility chief dubbed Mr Johnson “not a good role model” for children.
Katherine Birbalsingh, chair of the Social Mobility Commission, suggested that, even though she liked the prime minister, his personal life made her “raise an eyebrow”, and questioned whether he looked professional enough.
See below for how our coverage developed:
Starmer defends his questioning at PMQs
Sir Keir Starmer has defended his decision to highlight issues in the NHS rather than interrogate Boris Johnson about the confidence motion in his leadership during Prime Minister’s Questions two days after the vote.
The Labour leader said: “I think many people across the United Kingdom are very, very worried about the state of our health service.”
Critics slated him on Wednesday for not capitalising on the PM’s weakened position within his own party, accusing him of missing an open goal.
“If you’re waiting for cancer care, if you want to see a GP, or you’re worried about calling an ambulance, you’d be very pleased to hear the Leader of the Opposition challenging the Government on those issues which I know are of very deep concern to many many people.
“We have a weak Prime Minister, a divided Prime Minister, and the impact is on things like cancer care, is on waiting for a GP, waiting on an ambulance - and I think what people want to see at Prime Minister’s Questions is a Leader of the Opposition focusing on the issues that matter most to them.”
New blow for PM as home-ownership plans branded unworkable and a ‘gimmick’
Experts have dismissed Boris Johnson’s plans to boost home ownership as doomed to fail and likely to fuel the housing crisis, in a blow to his hopes of rescuing his troubled premiership. Rob Merrick reports:
New blow for PM as home ownership plans dismissed as unworkable and a ‘gimmick’
Beleaguered prime minister promises ‘revolution’ – but cabinet minister admits impact will be ‘modest’
Rees-Mogg refuses to debate why he ‘blocked’ bill that would have prevented elephant torture
Jacob Rees-Mogg and Commons leader Mark Spencer have refused to take part in a public debate on why they “blocked” a bill that would have spared elephants from torture in Asia.
The pair also declined to go on a fact-finding mission to see how the animals are brutally stabbed, whipped, chained, tied, beaten and starved into submission.
My exclusive report:
Jacob Rees-Mogg refuses to debate why he ‘blocked’ elephant abuse adverts ban
Exclusive: Brexit minister and Commons leader both reject fact-finding mission after vetoing ban on adverts for extreme cruelty
Ex-polling chief retracts claim that survey was suppressed
A former manager at YouGov has retracted a claim that the polling company suppressed research suggesting Jeremy Corbyn won a general election debate because it was “too positive about Labour”.
Chris Curtis said he was “happy to clarify the position and apologise to YouGov for any confusion caused” after accepting that the results were pulled because of concerns over the methods used.
Education Secretary Nadhim Zahawi, who co-founded the company, had been forced to deny he had wielded influence over the firm on Wednesday amid renewed claims of Tory pressure.
YouGov had insisted former political research manager Mr Curtis was “incorrect” to claim they dropped the poll because it favoured the then-Labour leader in 2017.
But now Mr Curtis, who is now head of political polling at rival firm Opinium, has tweeted: “I now accept YouGov’s position that in fact the results were pulled because of concerns other members of the team had about the methodology”.
PM accused of ‘hiding away’ on by-election campaign visit
Boris Johnson has been accused of “hiding away from people” during a brief visit to Tiverton and Honiton, as the Conservatives fight to hold on to the seat at the upcoming by-election.
The Liberal Democrats criticised the prime minister’s low-key visit to the Devon constituency after he was spotted meeting party candidate Helen Hurford and a small group of farmers for tea. Ashley Cowburn and Adam Forrest report:
Boris Johnson accused of ‘hiding away’ during Tiverton and Honiton visit
PM ‘not talking to ordinary people’ say Lib Dems, after he meets small group for tea
Judge gives go-ahead to Rwanda deportation
The Home Office’s first flight carrying asylum-seekers to Rwanda has been given the go-ahead by the High Court in London after campaigners lost a bid to halt it.
A judge refused to grant an injunction to prevent the first trip in the controversial scheme, scheduled to leave on Tuesday with 31 asylum-seekers on board, writes Thomas Kingsley:
UK’s first Rwanda deportation flight given go-ahead by high court
Campaigners had sought a judicial review of the Rwanda scheme to stop next week’s first planned flight
We will not be deterred, vows home secretary
Home secretary Priti Patel welcomed the ruling that Tuesday’s Rwanda deportation may go ahead, saying the Government would continue to deliver on “progressing our world-leading Migration Partnership”.
She said: “People will continue to try and prevent their relocation through legal challenges and last-minute claims, but we will not be deterred in breaking the deadly people smuggling trade and ultimately saving lives.
“Rwanda is a safe country, and has previously been recognised for providing a safe haven for refugees - we will continue preparations for the first flight to Rwanda, alongside the range of other measures intended to reduce small boat crossings.”
We will break traffickers’ business model, says Johnson
After the High Court’s Rwanda ruling, Boris Johnson tweeted: “Welcome news from the High Court today. We cannot allow people traffickers to put lives at risk and our world leading partnership will help break the business model of these ruthless criminals.’’
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments