OnlyFans creators and users criticise decision to ban ‘sexually explicit’ videos: ‘Sex workers deserve better’

OnlyFans says decision was made ‘to comply with the requests of our banking partners and payout providers’

Chelsea Ritschel
New York
Thursday 19 August 2021 15:52 EDT
Comments
OnlyFans sparks criticism with new policy change
OnlyFans sparks criticism with new policy change (Getty Images/iStockphoto)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

OnlyFans creators and users are criticising the company after it announced it would be banning “sexually explicit” content.

The change in policy, which was reported by Bloomberg on Thursday, will see users prohibited from posting pornographic content starting in October. However, users will still be able to post nude photos and videos.

According to OnlyFans, the new policy was created to appease its “banking partners and payment providers,” with the company explaining in a statement: “In order to ensure the long-term sustainability of our platform, and to continue to host an inclusive community of creators and fans, we must evolve our content guidelines.

“These changes are to comply with the requests of our banking partners and payout providers.”

In the statement, the company, which has been used as a platform for sex workers since it was founded in 2016, said it remains dedicated to its “community of 130m users and over 2m creators that have earned over $5bn on our platform”.

On social media, however, many OnlyFans users have accused the company of turning its back on the sex workers who made the platform so profitable.

“OnlyFans is banning all sexually explicit content from their platform. They’ve also made billions off of the backs of sex workers,” one content creator tweeted Thursday. “As someone who does sex work on OF, I’m angry for every creator that has relied on OF for an income just to be thrown out. This is so f***ed up.”

Another person tweeted: “Nothing new about a platform building itself on the backs of sex workers’ labor only to TOSS them off the site when they don’t think they need them anymore (and when said platform wants to stay in the good graces of financial institutions).”

Journalist Harron Walker also criticised the company’s choice, calling it “disgusting”.

“Not surprising but still disgusting that OnlyFans is choosing banks, VC investors, big tech (Apple+ Google dont allow adult content on their app stores, hence no app until the ‘sfw’ one announced this week), and profits over the sex workers using its platform,” Walker wrote.

The announcement also prompted many to make comparisons to Tumblr’s decision to ban adult content in December 2018, with one person accusing OnlyFans of “ditching” sex workers like the blogging site in an attempt to be accepted into the “mainstream”.

“Only Fans ain’t sh*t without sex workers,” they wrote. “Just like Tumblr before it, social media platforms love to use sex workers to launch and rise then ditch them when they want the respectability of the mainstream.”

Someone else suggested that the new policy would lead to the demise of the platform, writing: “Tumblr was purchased for $1.1bn, banned adult content, lost 30 per cent of its user base in three months, was sold for $3m. And Tumblr wasn’t even synonymous with adult content like OnlyFans is.”

Others, such as New York Times journalist Taylor Lorenz, questioned whether the policy applied to photos of sexual acts and sex toys.

“So are photos of people having sex ok? And what about dildos and other props which are so frequent in OF content? I feel like this vague statement from the company is going to create so much confusion,” she tweeted.

According to OnlyFans, when the policy goes into effect, creators will still be able to post nude content as long as “it is consistent with our Acceptable Use Policy”.

The company’s current terms state that nudity is allowed except when it is “recorded in or is being broadcast from a country, state or province where public nudity is illegal” and sexual activities are allowed except when “recorded in or is being broadcast from a public place where members of the public are reasonably likely to see the activities being performed”.

The platform also said that it would be sharing more details about the change in the coming days, and that it would be there to “actively support and guide our creators through this change in content guidelines”.

The change comes after OnlyFans co-founder Tom Stokely told The Independent last year that the company hoped to see a broader range of content creators, from musicians to influencers, using the platform.

“What we are hoping is to see a much broader range of influencers and creators from many different walks of life across the globe coming to OnlyFans to find a temporary home or longer home to use it to produce great content and make a living from it,” he said in April 2020.

The Independent has contacted OnlyFans for comment.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in