Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Blurred Lines trial: Pharrell Williams claims Miley Cyrus influenced song, not Marvin Gaye

The producer testified in a Los Angeles court after denying charges against him

Jess Denham
Thursday 05 March 2015 11:35 EST
Comments
Pharrell Williams attends the 'Blurred Lines' trial in Los Angeles on 4 March 2015
Pharrell Williams attends the 'Blurred Lines' trial in Los Angeles on 4 March 2015 (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Pharrell Williams has taken to the stand in the “Blurred Lines” trial to testify that it was Miley Cyrus, not Marvin Gaye, who inspired his chart-topping 2013 hit.

The US singer and producer insisted that he was “channelling that late Seventies feeling” rather than consciously copying Gaye’s “Got To Give It Up” when he co-wrote the track with Robin Thicke.

Williams, Thicke and rapper TI are being sued by Gaye’s children, who claim that the similarities between “Blurred Lines” and their father’s song infringe copyright.

“Sometimes when you look back on your past work, you see echoes of people,” Williams said in a Los Angeles court yesterday. “But that doesn’t mean that’s what you were doing.

“The last thing you want to do as a creator is take something of someone else’s when you love him. I respect [Gaye’s] music beyond words.”

The “Happy” star admitted that the two compositions “sounded like the same thing” when stripped to their basic structures, but argued that some notes had been shifted in pitch to make them sound more alike.

He continued to explain how he was influenced by “a bunch of country-sounding music” he was recording with Cyrus in June 2012.

“It was like blending this country sound with this up-tempo groove,” he said. “Once you have a groove, then you’re pretty much allowing the groove to tell you what’s next.”

Last week, Thicke performed a medley of songs from the likes of US and Bob Marley in a bid to prove that many tracks sound similar without being copies.

“Blurred Lines” has made more than £10.8 million worldwide, with both Williams and Thicke taking home more than £3 million in profits.

Gaye’s family are seeking estimated damages of £26 million, as well as money from touring and sales.

The trial continues.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in