'Blurred Lines' Marvin Gaye plagiarism lawsuit to be settled in court
A US judge determined there is a genuine dispute about whether several musical elements are similar
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A US judge has ruled that a plagiarism dispute over Robin Thicke’s “Blurred Lines” song should be settled in court.
The family of Marvin Gaye claim that the hit track, also featuring Pharrell Williams, steals elements of the soul singer’s 1977 hit “Got to Give it Up”.
District Judge John A Kronstadt made the ruling after reviewing conflicting analyses by experts, hired by Thicke and Pharrell and by Gaye's children to evaluate the two songs.
Thicke and Williams had sought a ruling on Thursday that “Blurred Lines” did not infringe on copyrights to the Gaye song.
However, the judge determined there is a genuine dispute about whether several musical elements, including signature phrases, hooks, bass lines, keyboard chords and vocal melodies, are similar.
In his ruling, Kronstadt limited the analysis to be made by a jury to how the compositions appear on sheet music, not how “Blurred Lines” and “Got to Give it Up” sound to listeners.
A trial is scheduled for 10 February in Los Angeles.
The singers’ lawyer, Howard King, wrote in an email to the Associated Press that the ruling was not a surprise, and he was confident the entertainers would win at trial.
“Since the compositions at issue are completely different, we remain confident of prevailing at trial,” King wrote.
A representative for Gaye's children, Nona, Frankie and Marvin Gaye III, did not have an immediate comment on the ruling.
Last month Thicke claimed that he did not actually write “Blurred Lines”. According to court papers filed in connection with the lawsuit, the singer said he was high on painkillers and alcohol in 2013– and said he had exaggerated his contribution to the song.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments