Appeals panel won't speed release of NYPD discipline records
A federal appeals court on Thursday agreed to keep the release of New York City police disciplinary records on pause while public safety unions fight a lower-court decision that had cleared the way for their disclosure
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A federal appeals court on Thursday agreed to keep the release of New York City police disciplinary records on pause while public safety unions fight a lower-court decision that had cleared the way for their disclosure.
Two of three judges who heard arguments on the matter Tuesday in the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals agreed to stay District Court Judge Katherine Polk Failla’s Aug. 21 ruling as the appeals process unfolds. The unions are seeking a way around a new state transparency law.
The other judge, Gerard Edmund Lynch, disagreed and would have upheld Failla's decision to lift a temporary restraining order, according to the court's ruling. The restraining order has remained in effect because of the union's appeal.
At Tuesday's hearing, Lynch questioned the merits of the union lawsuit since scores of discipline records have already been posted online, noting he was able to look up an officer he knows in a database of 320,000 NYPD misconduct complaints that the New York chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union posted online last month.
“The cat is not only out of the bag, it’s running the streets,” Lynch said.
“There are many more cats and many more bags," union lawyer Anthony Coles replied.
A message seeking comment on the ruling was left with a spokesperson for the unions.
An organization that opposes the union lawsuit, Communities United for Police Reform, said in a statement that it viewed the ruling as “very narrow, and very temporary” because it only blocks records from being made public while Failla’s ruling is under appeal.
“While we are disappointed by further delay in the publication of these records, today’s ruling is no indication that the underlying order allowing publication was incorrect,” the statement said.
The Police Benevolent Association, representing New York City police officers, and other public safety unions, sued the city on July 15 to block Mayor Bill de Blasio from making good on a promise to post a database of misconduct complaints online. They argued that posting unproven or false complaints could sully officers’ reputations and compromise their safety.
New York lawmakers, spurred to action by protests over the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis and other police misconduct, repealed a law in June that for decades blocked the public disclosure of disciplinary records for police officers, as well as firefighters and correctional officers.