If Russia can't be trusted in Syria, why does Boris Johnson think Saudi Arabia can police itself in Yemen?
Last Saturday saw devastating air strikes on a funeral in Sanaa, Yemen, which killed at least 155 people and wounded 500 more. Johnson’s first public response was to issue a tweet
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.In his first House of Commons appearance as Foreign Secretary, Boris Johnson was rightly damning of the Russian bombardment of Aleppo. He also exposed the hypocrisy at the heart of UK foreign policy in the Middle East.
Calling for protests outside the Russian Embassy in London, Johnson said he wanted attacks on hospitals to be “properly and fully investigated with a view to assembling the necessary evidence and ensuring that justice is done.” He added that he was “very attracted to the idea of holding these people to account before the International Criminal Court.”
He’s absolutely right. The bombing has had a terrible human cost, with hundreds of civilians killed since the ceasefire broke down last month. If international humanitarian law is to mean anything, then those responsible for war crimes must feel its full weight.
Where Johnson has been nowhere near as strong or principled is in his response to the humanitarian catastrophe that Saudi-led coalition forces have inflicted on Yemen. Last Saturday saw devastating air strikes on a funeral in Sanaa, Yemen, which killed at least 155 people and wounded 500 more. Johnson’s first public response was to issue a tweet. He made no calls for an end to attacks on civilian areas or for those responsible to be dragged before the ICC.
The lives of people in Yemen are just as valuable as those in Syria. So why was his response so much weaker?
One key difference is that the UK has been complicit in the Saudi-led attacks. From the outset, the then Defence Secretary, Philip Hammond, pledged to “support the Saudis in every practical way short of engaging in combat.” The Government has stayed true to its promise, having provided training and political support for Saudi combatants, and having licensed over £3.3bn worth of arms since the bombing began last March.
Right from the start, Saudi-led forces have been accused of hitting civilian targets. Schools and hospitals have been destroyed and more than 10,000 people have been killed, with a number of the attacks being linked to UK arms. Despite detailed reports of humanitarian law violations from the United Nations, Amnesty International and other respected organisations, the UK has stuck rigidly to the line that the best people to investigate Saudi Arabia for war crimes are the Saudi Arabian Government.
“It is important that the Saudi Arabian-led Coalition in the first instance conducts thorough and conclusive investigations into incidents where it is alleged that international humanitarian law has been violated,” Johnson said in a written statement last month. “They have the best insight into their own military procedures and will be able to conduct the most thorough and conclusive investigations.”
The limited steps the Saudi regime has taken prove how bad a policy this is. During the summer the Saudi-led coalition published its own report into the conduct of its forces. Needless to say it was a whitewash, only analysing eight of the hundreds of violations it has been accused of and largely exonerating itself of any wrongoding.
Regardless, the UK Government stuck to the same line in light of Saturday’s bombing. On Monday, a spokesperson for Number 10 said: “Until we have a full assessment of the facts on the ground, it would be inappropriate to comment further... We want the Saudis to carry out their investigation.”
This is appalling logic. Like the Assad regime in Syria, the Saudi administration cannot be trusted to run free and fair elections and has shown a contempt for human rights. How can it possibly be expected to investigate itself for war crimes?
Johnson is right to call for an end to the bombing of civilian areas and for investigations into war crimes against the people of Syria. At the same time, there are also major steps that he can take right now to alleviating the suffering of people in Yemen.
If Johnson and his colleagues are serious about peace and about the UK holding a positive influence on the world stage then they must stop the arms sales, end their support for the Saudi bombardment of Yemen, and hold the UK’s so-called ally to the same standard as other aggressors.
Andrew Smith is a spokesperson for Campaign Against Arms Trade
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments