Words / WICKED

Nicholas Bagnall
Saturday 15 April 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Wicked

THE word wicked has two faces, like the masks above the proscenium arch of theatres, one with a mouth turned down, the other up. Though the comic mask has been around a long time, it is much commoner than it used to be. "You wicked man" is a compliment not a brickbat; and for the under- 25s anything desirable is wicked, while the champion darts-player throws a wicked dart. Jonathan Aitken put on the tragic mask last week when he accused the Guardian of telling "wicked lies" about him. His anger seemed genuine enough, but I found myself unmoved, and at first wondered why. The old sense of the word has certainly lost some of its power to the smiling face next to it; but I don't think this was the real reason. (Nor was it because I might have agreed with the Guardian.)

It must have been because "wicked lie" is one of those automatic doublets nearly everyone uses - blissful ignorance, abject terror - whose attendant adjectives are mere idle hangers-on, and add nothing to the ignorance or terror in question. Admittedly some lies are worse than others, but if Mr Aitken really wanted to show how serious this one was he could have avoided the clich by deleting the wicked adjective or finding a better. (Malicious perhaps? Later, when he spoke of "the cancer of bent and twisted journalism", I did sit up; cancer is a frightener.)

It's odd that wicked, which in the Middle Ages had implied the deepest turpitude, should by the Renaissance (when poets would call Cupid "the wicked boy") have become enfeebled by jokiness. As the age of faith receded perhaps our guilt receded with it, and we could make light of it. Now, as I say, as often as not it's a word of admiration, or even an exclamation of joy.

Nicholas Bagnall

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in