WORDS: Principles

Nicholas Bagnall
Saturday 05 February 2005 20:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

prin si-pls

Neil Kinnock's acceptance of a peerage last week showed "a sad lack of principle" in the old left-wing warrior, a Guardian reader complained. I wouldn't have thought so myself, now that the Lords aren't the privileged bunch they used to be. The only sort of decline I could see here was a sad decline in the power and influence of the word principle.

This was once a noble word, descended directly from the same word in Latin - princeps, meaning the Big Cheese; prince is from the same source. Principalis, the Latin for principal, was merely an attendant adjective, sowing confusion in the minds of generations of schoolchildren and seemingly unnecessary in any case since princeps had served the ancient Romans as both adjective and noun.

Meanwhile principles are not what they used to be, since we live in a pluralist society now and yours may be quite different from mine. I could, if I wanted, have six different principles before breakfast, each of them equally valid at the time. This is all a long way from the original idea of a principle as the one inviolable thing that mattered above all others, or else one of the natural laws, like the laws of physics, that determine the nature of the universe. The missing principle in Lord Kinnock's case, according to the Guardian reader, would presumably have been that kind hearts always matter more than any number of coronets, never mind the circumstances, anything less being inexcusably pragmatical.

However, principle has long been a lost cause. It had already started going downhill in Victoria's day, when people had begun using the expression in principle, by which they generally meant that they intended to break one of their own, or else turn a blind eye to other people's breaking theirs.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in