words:Liberal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE Government was adopting a "more liberal approach" to arms sales in 1989, says Sir Richard Scott's draft chapter leaked to the Independent last week; a letter to Baroness Thatcher from the Ministry of Defence spoke of a "more flexible interpretation of the guidelines". We seem to have liberal in one of its seedier moods here, suggestive of the nudge and wink. I can't help thinking of William Hamilton's New Yorker cartoon showing a group of shady businessmen, one of whom says knowingly: "Our auditor will be observing accepted accounting practices, if you know what I mean."
Liberal began nobly enough, meaning no more, in its happy dawn, than "to do with freedom". Free men pursued the liberal arts while others not so free slaved at the sciences, or "useful arts", which kept the free men alive. Then 19th-century liberals declared that freedom should be universal, and greatly improved the word's image by campaigning against prejudice and cant. But it was tarnished by people who confused freedom with licence and thought liberal-mindedness meant broad-mindedness which in turn led to wicked tendencies, if not to actual sedition. Indeed, in the States it has never recovered, and is used as a term of abuse. In Britain, conversely, it has been a hate-word with the left. Rebellious students used to tell me they couldn't stand liberals because they were too reasonable to be argued with.
Liberal can't win. We speak of dissolute hosts who are too liberal with the drinks, or of ladies, built, we say snidely, on liberal lines. Its Old English equivalent free is just as vulnerable: if you say a man is too free with his opinions you mean he's being impertinent. Compare pious, once a good word meaning devout, now a bad one meaning smug. What cynics we all are.
Nicholas Bagnall
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments