word of mouth shame

Louis Palabrota
Tuesday 18 July 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The words "shame" and "ashamed" have crossed my lips more than usual this past week, as often as not in the company of others such as appeasement, cynical and bastards. Shame, from the Old English sceamu, a word as ancient as the language itself. We must have needed it from the outset.

The greater the shame, the more likely it is to call on its cousin in public relations, euphemism. "Ethnic cleansing", now there's a euphemism. We keep using the term because we lack the word that the euphemism "ethnic cleansing" is covering for. That's what happens with shame; it makes you tongue-tied.

Not that we haven't been here before. There were the Highland "clearances", a nice, tidy word for driving the crofters off their land. Oliver Cromwell, who as a puritan put a premium on cleanliness, "transplanted" the Catholic Irish to the barren wastes of Connaught in the west of Ireland. Torquemada, founder of the Spanish Inquisition, sought to "purge" Spain at the stake of his autos da fe. Interesting that the second part of his name (quemada) is Spanish for "burnt"; destiny, I suppose. Stalin, who put Torquemada in the shade when it came to purges, "ethnically cleansed" vast areas of the Soviet Union in what were termed "resettlement programmes".

But no one took to cleanliness quite like the Nazis. Fuelled by their fantasies of a blue-eyed, if pagan, Aryan past, they set about the national housework in order to maintain "racial hygiene" and achieve "ethnic purity". Adopting the language of public health officials, they declared "cleansed" areas Judenrein (free of Jews). But in the catechism of shame it is hard to beat "final solution", a euphemism arrived at by the algebra of evil.

I realise that these days grown-ups don't use words like evil, and that while we were watching war crimes live on prime-time TV, the Prime Minister was setting up a sporty photo opportunity. But I have this feeling that in 50 years' time, just as President Chirac has finally admitted that Vichy France was an enthusiastic participant in the final solution, some politician - one of "ours" - will be laying a wreath at Srebrenica or Zepa. And they'll make a speech and say something about shame, our shame. I'm not sure there's a word for this feeling; let's call it pre-emptive disgust.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in