Two cheers for Facebook’s concession to HMRC
The victory here is a result of public pressure - campaigners deserve credit
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.So much for the “Double Irish”. Facebook has promised it will no longer reroute profits made in the UK to Ireland, where they are taxed at a nominal rate, but will pay a more appropriate amount into the coffers of HMRC. The company has admitted what almost everyone else could see: it is absurd for a firm that made £2.5bn in global profits last year to pay, in one of its biggest markets, less tax than an individual worker on the average salary (at a sum total of £4,327).
We say “almost everyone” deliberately. Any pleasure at the announcement is tempered by the fact that, earlier in the week, HMRC made it clear that it saw nothing wrong with the Double Irish, or any of the other multinational tax-avoidance schemes. “It is simply the way that corporation tax works,” a policy paper explained.
The victory here is a result of public pressure. Campaigners deserve credit. But, as we report, it will take years before Facebook actually pays any additional tax. And even then relying on giant tech firms to voluntarily change their corporation structures so that they pay more tax leaves a great deal to be desired. The Government’s tax-collecting body should be leading the charge for reform that compels companies to have profits taxed where they are made, not in a convenient shelter.
There is, otherwise, a risk that tax will become simply a weapon in a company’s PR arsenal, with gestures made whenever the heat becomes intolerable. Facebook has no doubt acted wisely. The company shows signs of adopting a less flagrantly dismissive appreciation of the link between the state and private enterprise. (Mark Zuckerberg does not need to send internet-disseminating balloons into the skies above the Midlands, for example.) We can hope that more multinationals follow its example. But HMRC ought to endeavour not to leave that as our only option.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments