Tunnel fears are justified : LETTERS
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Dr Sidney Alford Sir: I am not sure to what extent, if at all, Christian Wolmar is writing with tongue in cheek about the security of the Channel tunnel ("Making a crisis out of a tunnel", 31 January). The tunnel trains are very much more attractive targets from the point of view of terrorists than are ferries or other trains because of the uniqueness of the tunnel and the extravagant praise and money that has been heaped upon it since its inception. The immobilisation of a train in a tunnel is, moreover, a far greater inconvenience than it is in the open.
Mr Wolmar is also wrong in his statement that, "Nobody is suggesting that a bomb could destroy the tunnel itself." I blow things up for a living, and I suggest it. When I attempted to discuss this disagreeable possibility privately with Eurotunnel some years ago, they responded with a bland assurance that all possible risks had been considered by the best possible experts.
I do agree with Christian Wolmar in that pseudo-security or, as he puts it, "sloppy practices", are counter-productive. The self-important and condescending "we do not discuss security matters" with which Eurotunnel dismisses honest and informed enquiry may be truer than they mean to imply.
Yours faithfully, Sidney Alford Explosives Engineering Corsham, Wiltshire 31 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments