Why we can't let Tommy Robinson be the voice of Brexit
To conflate fascism with Leave voters not only provides him with what he wants – leadership – but negates all legitimate criticism of the EU and reasons for voting to leave
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.On Sunday, the eve of the parliamentary vote on May’s deal to leave the EU, Tommy Robinson is leading a march on Westminster against what he’s calling “The Great Brexit Betrayal”.
In a characteristic move of cynical opportunism, Robinson – real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon – is again piggybacking on a mainstream issue to raise his profile, guarantee media attention, win over wealthy backers and legitimise his politics of hate.
From EDL to UKIP advisor, Yaxley-Lennon has changed his identity, his narrative and pitch a number of times, in an apparent effort to broaden his support. And it seems he wants this march to be the flagship moment of his latest rebrand attempt.
But this pivot is dangerous. In an attempt to make himself the natural leader of Leavers, Yaxley-Lennon is trying to morph the conflict between the 90 per cent of people who instinctively disagree with fascist sentiments and the 10 per cent of potential sympathisers with that of the 48 per cent of people who voted for remain and the 52 per cent who voted to leave. I have little doubt that he wants to position himself as the representative of half of this country’s electorate which, if successful, would dramatically shift British politics to the right.
While it’s true that the Leave campaign drew heavily on reactionary narratives of immigration, race and nationalism, it doesn’t follow that all 17 million Leave voters naturally subscribe to the far-right politics of Yaxley-Lennon.
To assume so not only provides him with what he wants – leadership – but negates all legitimate criticism of the EU and reasons for voting to leave. These reasons include serious concerns about undemocratic and unaccountable structures, racist and deadly European borders, as well as clear limitations for pursuing a transformative socialist agenda within the single market, which would place significant restrictions on a Corbyn-led government.
This conflation of fascism with Leave voters also denies any attempt to critically understand the role of the EU and its associated institutions in propping up a neo-liberal agenda and enforcing austerity politics upon its member states in reaction to large scale economic crises, which precipitated the conditions for fascism to grow and thrive throughout the continent. Just take Greece, where EU-imposed austerity directly laid the foundations for Golden Dawn’s dramatic and terrifying rise.
Remain or Leave, it’s essential we recognise the foundations of fascism have been laid in Britain by decades of destruction to communities under neo-liberalism, the 2008 financial crisis and ensuing Tory austerity, and the associated decline in living standards over the last 10 years.
Any successful strategy to combat the far right therefore has to reject the latter’s attempts to appropriate support from mainstream causes. The strategy should involve building a broad-based anti-fascist coalition, getting organised on the streets and in the workplace to disrupt and delegitimise their narrative, and demonstrate that the left hold the answers.
Momentum is supporting a counter protest to the march on Sunday with the slogan “No to Tommy Robinson, No to Fortress Britain” in a move to shift the discussion from his terms, and unite progressives on both side of the Brexit debate against the small, but rising forces of fascism.
This approach is essential to the success of the anti-fascist movement, and to resetting the terms of the debate to focus on combating the far right and an austerity that enabled and encouraged its growth. Austerity breeds fascism, and on Sunday we’ll be marching united against both.
Becky Boumelha is member of Momentum’s national coordinating group
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments