The unfairness of `fairness at work'

Pa Long
Saturday 30 January 1999 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

YOU REPORT that the Government is planning to increase maternity leave and introduce other privileges for those with children as part of its Fairness at Work Bill ("Maternity leave to be extended", 24 January). My question is: fair to whom?

There is increasingly a conflict in the workplace between the demands of employees with children and the customer. The former want only to work in the middle of the day and sometimes only during term-time. The latter want service 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. The result of this is that employees without children, or whose children have grown up, are expected to work harder and more unsocial hours than their colleagues to try to cover the gap. Those without children also find their colleagues refuse to change their hours to cover for holidays or time off, even though they will have been expected to work over when the others want leave or their children are ill.

The Government must realise that what is needed is fairness for all. If it insists on these measures then it should ensure that those without children are also compensated in some way. This could either be financially, or by more generous leave allowances, to compensate for their efforts.

PA LONG

Bristol

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in