The Spanish siesta is under threat - but getting rid of it won't make the workforce more productive

Incorporating the siesta is merely a different way of arranging the working day – flexitime before flexitime, if you will. It doesn't mean Spanish people are workshy

Monday 04 April 2016 13:33 EDT
Comments
Mr Rajoy (left) poses for a selfie in the city of Vigo, in Galicia, during the election campaign last week
Mr Rajoy (left) poses for a selfie in the city of Vigo, in Galicia, during the election campaign last week (AFP)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

For those who worry about Europe becoming a homogenised characterless place, some disturbing news: the siesta, symbol of the Spanish way of life, is threatened. Mariano Rajoy, the head of the centre-right coalition government, wants to scrap the three-hour midday break. Instead, he wants to replace it with a more conventional working day, but one that would be two hours shorter than, say, in Britain.

See what he’s trying to do there? Three minus two leaves an hour extra of labour to be extracted from the poor old Spanish worker, who, let’s face it, has suffered many deprivations in recent years, not least one of the highest unemployment rates in the EU.

There is much misunderstanding about the siesta. Northern Europeans tend to think of it as a product of laziness, as if there were no idle Germans or workshy Swedes around. Far from it, incorporating the siesta is merely a different way of arranging the working day – flexitime before flexitime, if you will.

It no doubt can trace its origins to baking away in the hot Spanish midday sun. The invention of air conditioning probably removed much of its rationale, but it remains a perfectly workable and indeed attractive way of getting through the grind. Post-prandial naps are, after all, recognised to be beneficial, and a pause in the inhuman pace of modern labour is nothing to be ashamed of. In other countries, such an approach is talked up as the “power nap”.

So thanks to Mr Rajoy and his political opponents, the siesta is now something of a political football in Spain. In some towns, radical left-wing mayors have made the siesta compulsory, though how this works for insomniacs has not been revealed. Perhaps something like that is beyond even Spanish ingenuity.

Some in Spain argue that the siesta could improve their quality of life, raise low birth rates and reduce marriage breakdowns. Maybe, but it is also true that Spain's economic performance has little to do with the traditional mid-day snooze, and its growth in productivity was higher in the high noon of siesta than it is now.

Maybe Spanish bankers and politicians didn’t have a long enough snooze in the go-go decade before the great financial crash of 2008: a little question for Mr Rajoy and his colleagues to sleep on.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in