Tax law and pension funds: Letter

Tom Ross
Monday 06 May 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Following the article "NAPF chief proposes to end tax free nest eggs" (3 May), I wish to clarify NAPF's position in regard to changes in the tax treatment of retirement lump sums and investment income. In most UK schemes, the current taxation system provides advantage for the scheme members at the point of retirement whereas an improvement in the tax treatment of investment income would usually pass on to the employer. That could be inequitable.

The current regime is entirely defensible because schemes invest heavily in UK equities and the current combination of ACT and mainstream corporation tax, where both are payable, results in an effective tax rate of 16.66 per cent on distributable earnings. Even before the iniquitous change in 1993, dropping ACT to 20 per cent, the effective rate of tax was 11.11 per cent. It is wrong to claim that pension funds are truly tax free. In essence we pay tax on part of our investment income and it is therefore entirely justifiable that part of our benefits are tax-free. NAPF has not proposed any changes to this structure, nor does it intend to.

Tom Ross

Chairman

National Association of

Pension Funds Limited

London SW1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in