Syrian civil war: US must tip the balance towards the moderates

Mr Obama should seriously consider the offer of ground troops from Saudi Arabia and the UAE

Tuesday 09 February 2016 18:06 EST
Comments
Civilians react following a reported Syrian regime air strike in a rebel-controlled area in Aleppo
Civilians react following a reported Syrian regime air strike in a rebel-controlled area in Aleppo (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Syrian conflict can no longer be described as a stalemate. Regime forces, aided by Russian air power, are threatening to cut off Aleppo, a key rebel stronghold. If they can retake the city, it will be the opposition’s most significant defeat since the revolution began in 2011.

As was feared – by this newspaper, among others – Bashar al-Assad and his allies used the cover of UN-brokered peace talks to step up their military campaign, in an attempt to decisively swing the outcome. They had no intention of pursuing ceasefires, as was clear from increased Russian bombardments in the run-up to the now-postponed Geneva talks.

The US has played into Mr Assad’s hands. With a view to de-escalating conflict, the White House eased support for the rebels ahead of Geneva and pressurised Gulf nations to slow arms deliveries. This exposed the moderates to an onslaught from which they may not recover.

Two paths lie ahead. The first will see Russia and Mr Assad gradually crush the rebels. That will involve mass killing: a UN report into Mr Assad’s rule, and treatment of prisoners, concluded that his policies thus far amounted to the calculated “extermination” of all those who oppose him. The second will see Western and Gulf powers attempt to tip the balance back towards a stalemate from which negotiations can start. This may require more political capital than Barack Obama is willing to spend. But it is the right thing to do.

Mr Obama should seriously consider the offer of ground troops from Saudi Arabia and the UAE. He should establish a no-fly zone to protect as many civilians as possible, since Turkey is no longer letting them cross the border. He should drop aid to besieged towns. If the US retreats further, it will have betrayed the Syrian people, and turned its back as the humanitarian catastrophe enters what may be its darkest phase.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in