Stop moaning about Samantha Cameron’s ‘special adviser’ – you try being the PM’s wife for the day
From organising charity receptions in Downing Street to coordinating her personal work, parental responsibilities and state obligations there’s more than a full job of work to do for an assistant
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The ‘news’ that Samantha Cameron has a new taxpayer-funded ‘special adviser’ to help her plan her official diary and carry out her official duties as wife of the Prime Minister has elicited the usual howls of self-righteous outrage.
It’s a "vanity appointment" says Labour’s Jess Phillips who is always keen to hitch a lift on any passing bandwagon.
"I've just visited my local Jobcentre, which has had a seven-year recruitment freeze," she told The Mirror. "When tough decisions have to be made, I'm not sure the wife of the prime minister needs a special adviser."
Her reaction wasn’t so different from that other Labour bandwagoneer Tom Watson who in 2012 expressed outrage when Mrs Cameron first got help to carry out her official duties.
"The vanity of David Cameron is costing taxpayers hundreds of thousands of pounds,” he said at the time.
"It's outrageous that he is creating a royal court while at the same time axing half a million public workers."
Such statements of anger are both unfair and knowingly ignorant of the realities of life for a public figure like Mrs Cameron.
As Westminster insiders (and not stupid people) both Ms Phillips and Mr Watson know all about the public demands on a figure like Mrs Cameron.
From organising charity receptions in Downing Street to coordinating her personal work, parental responsibilities and state obligations as the Prime Minister’s wife there is more than a full job of work to do being a special adviser to Mrs Cameron.
And it is important work. Mrs Cameron is a patron of Save the Children, the respite care charity Revitalise and a quick internet search throws up numerous events and fundraisers that she has presided over at Downing Street – at many of which her husband was not even present.
It was the same with her predecessors. It will be the same with her successors.
So rather than whinge about the relatively small cost of the support Mrs Cameron gets for her official role Labour should see the bigger picture.
There are many legitimate complaints to be made about this Government – but this is not one of them.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments