State is a threat to privacy, too: Letter
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Lord Wakeham's recent statement ("Press faces tighter intrusion laws", 11 October) rightly questioned the effectiveness of self-regulation in the press. The European Convention on Human Rights recognises that press freedom is an essential component of a democratic society, but also that the state should protect the right to respect for private and family life. The law in this country should reflect both important rights by providing a right to privacy, subject, of course, to a public interest defence.
As chair of the Press Complaints Commission, Lord Wakeham is not concerned with the intrusions of privacy by the state itself. We believe that the privacy debate should not just focus on the treatment of celebrities by the press, but on the intrusions into the lives of ordinary people by state bodies, whether government departments, local authorities or the police. Lord Wakeham is wrong when he argues that nobody would benefit from statutory controls, as at present such people simply have no remedy.
The High Court will shortly decide whether a Brentwood man can bring judicial review proceedings against his local authority for passing to the media a video taken from its closed circuit television system showing him about to commit suicide. The local authority claims to have done nothing legally or morally wrong. As the law currently stands, he cannot complain of a breach of his right to privacy, because he has no such right.
PHILIP LEACH
Legal Office, Liberty
London SE1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments