Rich man's rebellion borne by the poor
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I USUALLY greatly admire Neal Ascherson's perceptive and sensitive articles. I, too, abominate the poll tax, but to pay it is a legal obligation and I cannot pick and choose the laws I decide to obey.
If Mr Ascherson's view ('Why I'm proud, and glad, that I broke the law', 26 July) was generally accepted, we would have, not society, but anarchy. Much legislation, similar to that enacting the poll tax, creates a clash between a citizen's honest principles and the law: Sikhs and the wearing of crash helments is one.
All Mr Ascherson did by non- payment was to ensure a difficult time for his local authority (which may well not have supported the poll tax). Unless he believes that the United Kingdom is returning to 18th-century government of 'oligarchy tempered by riot', citizens must obey the law even though they detest it. If he does not believe this, he can use only legitimate pressures.
Many people voted for the government that introduced the poll tax; of course, such voters were a minority, but a large one. Perhaps the policy can be made more representative of its citizens only by revolution. Stand in the front line, Mr Ascherson; I will cut your sandwiches.
M W Evans
Inzievar, Fife
THE criteria to justify principled civil disobedience - vital to avoid the anarchy that would ensue if every perceived legislative unfairness sufficed - are not considered by Mr Ascherson, who nonetheless invokes with odd glee the plight of the already poor, suffering attachment orders by councils desperately trying to make ends meet. The other corollary is reduction in services. It appears that others pay the price of the campaigners' principles. Mr Ascherson should explain why.
In mid-article, he derides a politician's view that the rioting in Trafalgar Square had nothing to do with the repeal of the poll tax. By the end, we're told that the 'invitation to stay out of politics and riot instead' must be rejected. Either he has flatly contradicted himself, or is employing some Jesuitical argument that riots can be classified by political correctness and thus acceptability. Left- wing causes can only be discredited by such woolly thinking.
C J A Jones
Henbury, Bristol
WE ARE two old-age pensioners. We are each now paying pounds 100 extra each on poll tax because of people like Neal Ascherson.
C G Hodgart
Barr, Ayrshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments