Mr Mates and I: some facts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: You have written extensively about my contact with Michael Mates MP, but have not asked me personally about it. In these circumstances, I will volunteer the
information.
At no time did I ever contact Mr Mates: he always contacted me. He initially contacted me as a Member of Parliament about concerns expressed by Asil Nadir and requested verification of certain information. After obtaining Mr Nadir's consent, I was able to confirm certain facts. On other occasions he made similar requests, and when the information was available I was able to confirm it.
The matters raised had nothing to do with the merits of the trial and were not directed to whether Mr Nadir was innocent or guilty of the charges against him. This was never discussed. The matters he raised related to whether there were some things wrong with the way the case was being prosecuted.
Mr Mates was concerned about those matters and he appreciated that I was equally concerned. He asked what would be the proper steps to take if he wished to pursue the matter, and I suggested that the proper person to approach was the Attorney-General, who is ultimately responsible for all prosecutions. I made it clear that in my view these matters could not be raised at the trial because they had nothing to do with whether Mr Nadir was innocent or guilty.
I did not write personally to the Attorney-General until immediately after the allegation concerning the judge was made.
Yours faithfully,
ANTHONY SCRIVENER
London, WC1
3 July
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments