McNamara's other lost war
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ROBERT McNamara appears to be trying to apologise for the policy mistakes of the Vietnam war period ("Old Enough to Know Better", Review, 30 July). However, neither he nor your reviewer mention the damage his subsequent tenure at the World Bank may have caused the countries of the Third World.
McNamara came to the World Bank in 1968 when it was still something of a backwater institution. By the time he left in 1981 he had transformed it into one of the most important players in world affairs.
He brought to it a missionary zeal against "absolute poverty", which was ultimately ineffective because of the failure to understand the dynamics of poverty, meaning, for example, that development aid was channelled through the governments that helped cause poverty in the first place. By the end of his tenure at the Bank, McNamara had introduced "policy- based lending" - loans with inescapable conditions attached. Thus he founded the structural adjustment programmes that have yet to produce any real dividend for Third World countries after almost a decade and a half, and which have, if anything, increased the depth and breadth of poverty worldwide.
McNamara's comment on the policy of the US in Vietnam is also an apt description of his time at the World Bank: "We failed to ask the important questions ... We responded with force out of the desire to do something but not knowing what else to do."
Alan Sturla Sverrisson
asverr@postman.sx.ac.uk
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments