The government is foolish to stage a replay with Marcus Rashford but might yet scramble a messy draw
Ministers are embroiled in a second war of words with the footballer about free school meals. Politically unwise, perhaps, but they might get a different result this time
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.If Boris Johnson hoped that handing Marcus Rashford an MBE would make him less of a thorn in the governmentâs side, then he has already been proved spectacularly wrong.
The government is embroiled in a second war of words with the Manchester United and England footballer about whether free school meals should be provided during all school holidays. In hours, 100,000 people signed a petition calling for greater access to free school meals, increase the value of healthy start vouchers  and provide activities during holidays to end âholiday hungerâ.Â
Although the Welsh government has guaranteed free meals in school breaks from this monthâs half-term to next Easter at a cost of ÂŁ11m, Downing Street has refused to follow suit in England. Rashford said: âFor too long this conversation has been delayed. Child food poverty in the UK is not a result of Covid-19. We must act with urgency to stabilise the households of our vulnerable children.â
Today his campaign won the backing of Anne Longfield, the childrenâs commissioner for England. She told Times Radio that âfood insecurityâ affected millions of families and it was time for the government to be âbold and generousâ.
On the face of it, the government looks foolish to stage a replay with Rashford. The 22-year-oldâs clever, high-profile campaign for free meals forced it into a swift climbdown in June, one of many U-turns in a troubled year. Some Tory MPs think Johnson has made the wrong call and will end up with the same result.
Robert Halfon, who chairs the Education Committee, described the governmentâs decision as âvery disappointingâ. He has tabled a Commons motion, signed by five fellow Tories, saying a food hunger strategy would also âaddress inequalities, improve the long-term health and resilience of the population, reduce childhood obesity, improve childrenâs academic performance, support parents to stay in work during the holidays, and ease the strain on the welfare systemâ.
Rishi Sunak, the chancellor, is already worried about the ever-growing cost of coronavirus amid further restrictions in the second wave. Yet the cost of free meals in school holidays would be relatively small compared to the political hit the Tories would suffer if they stand firm.
Appearing Scrooge-like, especially during the Christmas break, would fuel a dangerous narrative about âuncaring Toriesâ, which is already building as local leaders in the north oppose restrictions they say are being âimposed by Londonâ.
Louise Casey, until recently the governmentâs adviser on homelessness and who has 20 years experience in Whitehall, told the BBC that conditions on the ground are now worse than under Margaret Thatcher in the 1980s. She asked: âDo we want to go back to the days where people can't put shoes on the children's feet? Are we actually asking people in places like Liverpool to go out and prostitute themselves, so that they could put food on the table?"Â
Ministers also have a big dilemma over whether to extend a ÂŁ20-a-week coronavirus top-up to universal credit when it expires next April. The Treasury is nervous, but imposing a ÂŁ1,000-a-year benefits cut on six million poor families would not be clever politics, yet keeping the bonus forever would cost an eventual ÂŁ6bn a year.
There are reasons why ministers think they might get a different result against Rashford this time, perhaps even scramble a messy draw. As Downing Street argued: âWe took that decision to extend free school meals during the pandemic when schools were partially closed during lockdown. Weâre in a different position now with schools back open to all pupils.â
Johnsonâs spokesperson added: âItâs not for schools to regularly provide food to pupils during the school holidays. We believe the best way to support families outside of term time is through universal credit rather than government subsidising meals.â
Although Rashford rightly grabbed the headlines in June, the government also climbed down then because a backbench Tory rebellion threatened a humiliating Commons defeat. This time, Tory MPs might feel they have more pressing  battles, notably against further coronavirus restrictions that would harm the economy.
Yet the widening north-south divide poses a real political risk to Johnsonâs grip on the âred wallâ voters who flocked to him last December. A quick tactical retreat might be preferable to a bloody nose. As Rashford put it: âThis is not going away anytime soon and neither am I.â
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments