The government’s voter ID plans could disenfranchise people with disabilities

Send your letters to letters@independent.co.uk

Friday 20 December 2019 12:24 EST
Comments
People arrive to cast their votes at a polling station during the general election
People arrive to cast their votes at a polling station during the general election (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

My nephew David has cerebral palsy. His passport has expired; he has no foreseeable need to renew it at a cost of £75.50. He will never have a driving licence. He won’t get a bus pass for another 14 years, or possibly even later by then. Like thousands of others he would be disenfranchised if the government made photo IDs a condition for casting his vote.

Christopher Hall
Banbury

Don’t trust Boris

Already we can see the beginnings of the attacks on our constitution and way of life which are the inevitable consequences of the election of this ridiculous prime minister. We have all witnessed his willingness to employ deception, his self-interest and and his lack of humanity on many occasions. As the catastrophe of continued austerity, hard Brexit and the absence of a governmental moral compass unfolds he will seek to blame others for the damage this will do.

During the election we were well-served by independent fact checkers (real ones), more so than ever before. This must continue. The best way to serve democracy now is to ensure that Boris Johnson is held fully, and publicly, accountable for every last scrap of damage. We must monitor what he said he would do, what he actually does, what he doesn’t do, and the consequences. It is important for this government to be exposed to the highest level of forensic scrutiny; it has forfeited its right to implicit trust.

David Lowndes
Soberton

Three too many

Both the BBC and The Independent say that Donald Trump is only the third US president to be impeached. Three out of 45 isn’t “only”, it is “yet another”.

“Only” implies that all is well. In my opinion, this rate of impeachment indicates that the lack of decency among politicians who achieve great power means that there is little hope for the world.

Tony Baker
Thirsk

You’re out

In light of the concerning proposals contained in the Queen’s Speech, is now an appropriate time for the leaders of the Celtic nations to appoint a royal commission to consider whether there are sufficient grounds to expel England from the union?

Ian Hurdley
Address supplied

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in