Training for the Probation Service
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr David Fraser Sir: Susan Hinds (letter, 24 January) wrongly accuses Peter Coad (letter, 20 January) of misquoting Home Office statistics relating to the reconvictions of persons under supervision. Mr Coad correctly referred to reconvictions of persons within two years following the commencement of an order.
Mrs Hinds also refers to Home Office statistics which claim that 88 per cent of all probation orders are completed in full, and not terminated early because of a subsequent criminal conviction; but she is wrong to call this a "success". The commission offurther offences by those under supervision of a probation order or community service order is commonplace, but long-suffering magistrates frequently deal with them in such a way as to allow their period of supervision to continue. This can apply even when the offender is sent to prison.
Yours sincerely, DAVID FRASER Bristol 25 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments