Our politicians need to listen to the people, not think tanks

Letters to the editor: our readers share their views. Please send your letters to letters@independent.co.uk

Sunday 22 January 2023 09:32 EST
Comments
Currently the Labour Party are taking advice and guidance from the Fabian Society
Currently the Labour Party are taking advice and guidance from the Fabian Society (AFP/Getty)

It has occurred to me that governments and would-be governments appear to be advised by business and pressure groups, which then tell the people what they need.

Currently, the Labour Party are taking advice and guidance from the Fabian Society as to the policies and governance offered to the electorate. No doubt the Tories take advice from other groups of interested parties which has led to the reduction of our standard of living over these past 12 years.

Of course the government has to take a rounded view of the needs of the country, but I have never been asked for my views on policies or legislation. Why not ask the people what their needs are, and instead use that as a template for future governance?

We can’t trust our current batch of MPs to take our message back to government, so why not have a method of ensuring that the electorate’s message is heard loud and clear?

Keith Poole

Basingstoke

Proverb 20:23

That Church of England bishops are once again refusing to allow same-sex marriage in its churches redefines the ridiculous anachronism that has become par for the course with the institution.

The choice is simple: as a private religious group The Church of England is absolutely entitled to hold its own esoteric dogma and further entrench its own obsolescence, but with unelected seats in government, control over a quarter of the country’s primary schools in England, and the power to solemnise legal marriages, it must also recognise state equality legislation.

Neil Barber

Edinburgh

Without a clear plan to rejoin the EU, Remainers won’t stick around

I fully agree with Mick O’Hare’s views regarding Brexit. As a Liberal Democrat since the mid-1950s, I believe we must get off the fence and state clearly that we believe that the United Kingdom will be significantly better off as a member of the EU.

There are thousands of voters who believe the same, and who currently have no party to whom they can offer their support. At this moment we cannot define a timescale, but a start would be to align the UK with the single market conditions. The Lib Dem hierarchy must seize this opportunity.

Jim White

Uckfield

Low Traffic Neighbourhoods could be a great thing – if they were enforced properly

I live near a trial Low Traffic Neighbourhood. From enduring a thundering 2,000 cars per day, with some residents newly diagnosed with asthma due to the perpetual smog, things are now better.

Initially and inexplicably, the bollards installed to enforce the legislation were made of rather floppy plastic. These were quickly destroyed by vandals, and residents have since been enduring daily abuse trying to maintain the LTN in any way they can (often as human bollards).

Oxford City Council promised us proper metal bollards, but months have gone by and nothing has been done. Escalating tensions from anti-LTN thugs (as well as conspiracy theorists) are going to result in someone getting injured or killed if nothing is done soon.

Dr Daniel Emlyn-Jones

Oxford

Bonfires and vanity

It’s not surprising that the Tories want a bonfire of regulations when, within a few months of each other, two of their leaders have been fined for breaking health and safety laws.

Rishi Sunak may never recover his authority. After all, he must be the first prime minister who – upon broadcasting his views – has been told by the police to “belt up”.

Roger Hinds

Surrey

Rulebreakers must be prepared to pay a hefty toll

A £50 fine for breaking covid lockdown rules? £100 for not wearing a seat belt? Where will it all end, and just how much of a deterrent is this?

In Switzerland (and currently under consideration in France) motorists are fined a percentage of their annual income for motoring offences. That’s what I call a fair punishment.

Geoff Forward

Stirling

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in