Putting a brake on friction theory
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.FFrom Mr Timothy Birrell
Sir: My understanding of wheelslip protection as fitted to modern trains is that its principal purpose is not, as with anti-lock braking on cars, to improve the rate of slowing, but largely to protect the steel tyres on train wheels from developing flats: that is, worn flat surfaces caused by locked sliding contact with the railhead.
In other words, it is concerned with avoiding the considerable expense of having stock out of traffic from premature tyre-turning. I recall not long ago reading in the railway press that there is some research evidence that a train, unlike a car, stops more quickly in a locked wheelslide than with the repeated application and release of the brakes caused by automatic wheelslip protection.
Yours faithfully,
TIMOTHY BIRRELL
Lockerbie,
Dumfriesshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments