LETTERS : How to have a say in Ireland

Alan Fisk
Saturday 11 February 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

GEOFFREY Wheatcroft writes that the Act of Union of 1801 was meant "to make `Britons' of the Irish, as the Scots had been made in the previous century". In fact, it was the Scots who set out to make "Britons" of the English, starting in 1603 when James VI of Scotland became James I of England, and proclaimed a "Kingdom of Great Britain". And it was the Scots, not the English, who settled Ulster and created the Northern Ireland problem. Tony Blair's proposal to give Scotland a national parliament, while denying one to England, stands in a long tradition of Scottish attempts to destroy England's identity as a nation.

Alan Fisk

Stowmarket, Suffolk

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in