LETTERS : Cherie Blair and the poll tax defaulter
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Last week, our main front-page article reported that Cherie Blair, a barrister and the wife of the Labour leader Tony Blair, had acted in a series of cases for councils pursuing poll tax defaulters. In one case, she asked a judge to return a bail ed defaulter to jail. We also reported that she had given a conference paper on how to enforce the law, including the threat of prison, against defaulters. A leader explained our decision to publish the story.
In response, we received nearly 100 letters. A large majority of these said we were wrong to give the story such prominence. Below, we publish a selection.
I CANNOT accept your assertion that you were somehow acting in the public interest by publishing an "account" of Cherie Blair's legal work. What point is it that you were trying to make? That in her professional life she found that she could not carry out Labour Party policy to the letter? Given that law comes from Parliament, I should imagine that many lawyers in the Labour Party would find themselves in this predicament during a period of Conservative rule. Should they resign from their work?
Furthermore, one would expect Martin Jacques and his lawyer to have a less-than- favourable view of Mrs Blair's court performance - after all they lost. And it was the judges who decided what action to take. And what of the councils that hired Mrs Blair?Who are they?
I am not saying don't be critical of the Labour Party. But please discuss its policies; don't engage in lecturing Mrs Blair on less-than-good evidence for something that happened when Tony Blair was not even the Labour leader.
Ian D Thatcher Glasgow
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments