Letter: What about Russia's fears?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Neal Ascherson laments the disappearance of the Helsinki spirit ("Russia often warns about its hardliners back home. It is moral blackmail", 23 March). Why not apply the Polish saying he quotes in defence of Warsaw's right to be heard - "nothing about us without us" - to Russia?
While one is tempted to agree that it is no longer acceptable for US and Russian presidents to "haggle over how many foreign troops could be stationed in Poland or whether tactical nuclear weapons could be deployed in Hungary", is it acceptable for Nato to push east regardless of Moscow's security concerns? Is it fair that while the West hangs on to every word from Warsaw, Budapest and Riga, Moscow is left to like Nato expansion or lump it, never mind that lumping it might lead to less security on our continent for everyone.
Any decision taken at Nato's Madrid summit in July that leads to Nato moving nearer Russia's border - breaking assurances given to Gorbachev - could be the catalyst for new East-West tensions and mutual distrust. Moreover, British voters should be aware of the pounds 2bn that Nato enlargement could cost. A Nato-Russia Charter could be a cheaper and much more secure option.
Better to have a Russia with its democratic leaders strengthened, onside and secure in the European tent, than outside with the likes of Zyuganov, Lebed and Zhirinovsky building on their electorates' feelings of alienation.
Paul Colston
Russian Information Agency
London SW7
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments