Letter: Trust science not maverick scientists
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Letter: Trust science not maverick
scientists
GEOFFREY LEAN'S general thesis about governments' handling of health scares such as BSE ("Deadly peril in our culture of denial", 24 March) is selective and doesn't consider the alternative.
We need a culture that bases decisions on public health and safety on the best available evidence. The public, of course, wants everything in "black and white" and immediate action taken, even if appropriate information isn't available. Under this pressure a culture of denial can develop. But would a culture of acceptance in which we reacted immediately, and expensively, to every scare be better?
In January 1976 scientists in the US rightly raised the possibility that cases of influenza in soldiers in Fort Dix could indicate that an epidemic might be coming. There was some evidence that it might be the dreaded Swine Flu, which killed millions after the First World War. By March the cautious appraisal had been elevated to a certainty. President Ford appeared on television begging the population to get vaccinated. The pharmaceutical industry couldn't guarantee a safe, effective vaccine in the time available and only agreed to make one if indemnified by the government. In the event there was no epidemic, but more than 4,000 people filed claims against the government because of side-effects of the vaccine. (Guillan-Barre Syndrome, which affects the nervous system, was associated with its use. More than 5 per cent of sufferers died.) Quite apart from the unnecessary deaths, the cost must have been more than pounds 170m - a few billion at today's values.
What if the UK had reacted in a similar way to some recent health scares and fads - for instance the idea that vitamins promote intelligence? Following the thinking of some "mavericks" we could have fed children potentially toxic doses of vitamins. So "put not thy trust in mavericks" - they get it wrong more often than they get it right.
Dr Ron Gardner
Northwich, Cheshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments