Letter: The poor do not deserve this
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ALTHOUGH no one can doubt Frank Field's commitment to the establishment of a more decent society, his remedies are too narrowly focused ("The poison in the welfare state", 14 May). Instead of highlighting the adverse impact of growing social divisions, the jettisoning of full employment, the lack of opportunity for young people, and the inadequacies of family support measures, he chooses to concentrate on the inappropriate behaviour of the poor and what he believes are rampant levels of benefit fraud.
His solution - self-interested social collectivism for the middle classes and remoralising programmes for the poor - is untenable as it will do little to bridge the social divide. What is required is a raft of policy measures, including high-quality training packages, carers' allowances and a fairer tax scheme, which would permit the better-off to demonstrate their commitment to the common good.
Robert M Page
School of Social Studies
The University of Nottingham
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments