LETTER : Rio's slums are not a theme park for tourists
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Jeremy Atiyah, on a favela tour in Rio de Janeiro's Rocinha, describes having his dark expectations pleasantly disappointed: "For the record," he writes, "it's clean ... in fact, it's almost nice." ("The boys from Brazil...", Travel and Money, 25 May.)
I know Rio well. Its slums, for complex reasons, are dangerous, unsanitary and extremely violent places. Around 5,000 people were murdered last year in the city, the vast majority in and around favelas. During the rainy season mud-slides kill others, destroying homes and property. The wily tourist is indeed relatively safe in Rio; a $50 tour of Rocinha - itself, in my opinion, in questionable taste as a kind of voyeuristic slum tour - will probably bring the punter back in one piece. But this misrepresents the situation in a city where poor people are forced to live in very difficult circumstances with the constant threat of violence.
Patrick Wilcken
London SW11
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments