Letter: ref. Deborah Orr article
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I have just read Deborah Orr's article ( The Ultimate Invasion of Privacy, 23rd February 2008 ) about "My Street," the film I made for Channel 4. She alerts readers to "a major ethical issue" and claims "It is perfectly clear that, in his awful situation Adam (one of the film's contributors) was in no fit state to sign a release form authorising broadcast." Orr wrongly implies I behaved unethically. If Orr had approached me to check the facts, which she did not, she would have learned that:-
- Adam had Tourette's and OCD. Neither of these conditions deprive someone of their intelligence or their ability to make decisions about their life. Adam was able to give informed consent to be filmed and he did so.
- Before I filmed with Adam I took advice from M.I.N.D. They advised that as he was over 18 (he was 25) and living alone and independently in the community, it was his choice and, significantly his right, to take part in any film and give his own consent to filming and the broadcast of that material.
- Adam talked to his friends, care workers and family about taking part in the film. He wanted to tell his story and show how he lived. Most importantly he wanted us to give an honest and accurate portrait of his life - both the good and the bad.
- Adam called us and asked us to come and film when he was having a particularly bad fit. He wanted people to see what he was going through.
- We only filmed once with a film crew. The other four times were on a small dv camera and for short periods of time. We did not "meticulously record" Adam's breakdown, as Orr suggests.
- In consultation with Adam we agreed what we would and would not show in the final film.
I came to know Adam well over the course of making this film. He welcomed our visits and enjoyed the filming. Deborah Orr presumably did not know him. It is an insult to Adam's memory to claim that his privacy was invaded or that he was incapable of giving consent. It is an insult to all Tourette's sufferers to imply that their condition might debar them from appearing on television.
As well as upholding Adam's right as an individual to have his story shown in accordance with his wishes, the documentary served an important public interest by providing valuable insight into the impact of Tourette's on the lives of those who suffer from it.
Yours truly
Sue Bourne
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments