Letter: Peace and secret arms deals
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I WISH success to every effort to find peace, whether it be in the Middle East, the former Yugoslavia, Somalia or Ireland, but is it not rather hypocritical to work for peace while at the same time fuelling conflicts by selling arms? Britain's share of the world arms trade has risen from 9 per cent in 1989 to 20 per cent in 1993. Instabilities in the Middle East and South- east Asia are exploited for an easy profit. Arms sold to both sides during the Iran-Iraq war prolonged its duration. Britain's arms sale to Iraq helped Saddam Hussein build up enough military force to invade Kuwait. Who supplies Indonesia's rulers with arms? They have occupied East Timor for nearly 20 years. During this time one third of the Timorese population has been killed. But the majority of arms sales are to Third World countries often burdened with debt, poverty or repressive dictatorships. There are 28 wars being fought in the world today, in which millions of people have died.
Few of these wars could be fought if governments ceased selling weapons to the participants for a profit.
Secrecy seems to be the norm for the Government's arms exports policy. Full information about arms sales should be made available to Parliament and public. The Scott inquiry will be a waste of time unless it helps end such secrecy.
Rev Emlyn Richards
Anglesey, Gwynedd
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments